FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—TRADERS WITH INDIANS
Power to appoint traders with Indians
25 U.S.C. § 261
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—TRADERS WITH INDIANS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 261 (Power to appoint traders with Indians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 261.
Text
The Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall have the sole power and authority to appoint traders to the Indian tribes and to make such rules and regulations as he may deem just and proper specifying the kind and quantity of goods and the prices at which such goods shall be sold to the Indians.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation
447 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Commission
380 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Rice v. Rehner
463 U.S. 713 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Pruitt
669 F.3d 1159 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NM
458 U.S. 832 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley
532 U.S. 645 (Supreme Court, 2001)
United States v. Baker
63 F.3d 1478 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Department of Taxation and Finance of NY v. Milhelm Attea & Bros.
512 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Central MacHinery Co. v. Arizona State Tax Commission
448 U.S. 160 (Supreme Court, 1980)
SAC and Fox Nation v. Pierce
213 F.3d 566 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)
Rockbridge v. Lincoln
449 F.2d 567 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
East Oakland-Fruitvale Planning Council, a Nonprofit California Corporation v. Donald Rumsfeld, Director, Office of Economic Opportunity
471 F.2d 524 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation v. Washington
446 F. Supp. 1339 (E.D. Washington, 1978)
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard
722 F.3d 457 (Second Circuit, 2013)
Herzog Brothers Trucking, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
508 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Warren Trading Post Company v. Moore
387 P.2d 809 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1963)
New York v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
160 F. Supp. 3d 629 (S.D. New York, 2016)
New York State Department of Taxation v. St. Regis Group
217 A.D.2d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Big Sandy Rancheria Enters. v. Rob Bonta
1 F.4th 710 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
Crow Tribe of Indians v. State of Mont.
469 F. Supp. 154 (D. Montana, 1979)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 15, 1876, ch. 289, §5, 19 Stat. 200.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/261.