FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
Emergency removal or placement of child; termination; appropriate action
25 U.S.C. § 1922
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1922 (Emergency removal or placement of child; termination; appropriate action) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1922.
Text
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the emergency removal of an Indian child who is a resident of or is domiciled on a reservation, but temporarily located off the reservation, from his parent or Indian custodian or the emergency placement of such child in a foster home or institution, under applicable State law, in order to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child. The State authority, official, or agency involved shall insure that the emergency removal or placement terminates immediately when such removal or placement is no longer necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the child and shall expeditiously initiate a child custody proceeding subject to the provisions of this subchapter, transfer the child to the jurisdiction of the appropri
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Desiree F. v. Daniel F.
99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 688 (California Court of Appeal, 2000)
In Re David H.
165 Cal. App. 4th 1626 (California Court of Appeal, 2008)
Carney v. Moore
1988 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1988)
In re E.G.M.
750 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
In Re the Welfare of J.A.S.
488 N.W.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1992)
IN THE MATTER OF S.J.W.
2023 OK 49 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2023)
In re S.R.
2019 MT 47 (Montana Supreme Court, 2019)
Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-Tate
446 P.3d 813 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2019)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF B.T.S.
2016 OK CIV APP 21 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2016)
Simmers v. State
2016 OK CIV APP 6 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
AJB and OF v. 18th Judicial District
2023 MT 7 (Montana Supreme Court, 2023)
People v. C.A.
417 P.3d 909 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2017)
Napa County Health & Human Services v. Karen F.
165 Cal. App. 4th 1626 (California Court of Appeal, 2008)
San Bernardino County Department of Children's Services v. Jeannie V.
130 Cal. App. 4th 1148 (California Court of Appeal, 2005)
IN THE MATTER OF I.T.S.
2021 OK 38 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2021)
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van Hunnik
(D. South Dakota, 2017)
IN THE MATTER OF MINOR CHILD G.V.
2016 OK CIV APP 6 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
In re Robert F.
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Rosalind M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's Services and Ingrid A. (Mother) and Togiak Traditional Council
(Alaska Supreme Court, 2024)
Dept. of Human Services v. A. C. S. G.
(Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §112, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3075.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1922.