FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
Parental rights; voluntary termination
25 U.S.C. § 1913
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 1913 (Parental rights; voluntary termination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 1913.
Text
(a)Consent; record; certification matters; invalid consents
Where any parent or Indian custodian voluntarily consents to a foster care placement or to termination of parental rights, such consent shall not be valid unless executed in writing and recorded before a judge of a court of competent jurisdiction and accompanied by the presiding judge's certificate that the terms and consequences of the consent were fully explained in detail and were fully understood by the parent or Indian custodian. The court shall also certify that either the parent or Indian custodian fully understood the explanation in English or that it was interpreted into a language that the parent or Indian custodian understood. Any consent given prior to, or within ten days after, birth of the Indian child shall not be
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
490 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Matter of Adoption of Halloway
732 P.2d 962 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re the Adoption of T.N.F.
781 P.2d 973 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1989)
Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.
2017 UT 59 (Utah Supreme Court, 2017)
Romelia W. v. Edward L.
127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 860 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Marlene C.
2011 NMSC 5 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 2011)
In Re N.N.E.
752 N.W.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2008)
In re J.M.
2009 MT 332 (Montana Supreme Court, 2009)
In Re Welfare of MG
201 P.3d 354 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Phillip A. C. v. Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Tribes of Alaska
149 P.3d 51 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2006)
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
731 S.E.2d 550 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
Quinn v. Walters
881 P.2d 795 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Navajo Nation v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF WASH.
47 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (E.D. Washington, 1999)
Nielson v. Ketchum
640 F.3d 1117 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
In Re Adoption of Keith MW
79 P.3d 623 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2003)
Stephenson v. NASTRO IN AND FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA
967 P.2d 616 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1998)
Brackeen v. Zinke
338 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D. Texas, 2018)
Doe v. Roe
902 P.2d 477 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1995)
Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. C.A.A.
783 P.2d 1159 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1989)
Department of Social & Health Services v. Native Village
110 Wash. App. 524 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §103, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3072.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 1913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/1913.