FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—IMPORT AND EXPORT
Service of subpena; proof of service
21 U.S.C. § 968
Title21 — Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—IMPORT AND EXPORT
This text of 21 U.S.C. § 968 (Service of subpena; proof of service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 968.
Text
A subpena of the Secretary of the Treasury may be served by any person designated in the subpena to serve it. Service upon a natural person may be made by personal delivery of the subpena to him. Service may be made upon a domestic or foreign corporation or upon a partnership or other unincorporated association which is subject to suit under a common name, by delivering the subpena to an officer, a managing or general agent, or to any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. The affidavit of the person serving the subpena entered on a true copy thereof by the person serving it shall be proof of service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Puig-Infante
19 F.3d 929 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Daniel Oriakhi
57 F.3d 1290 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Lopez-Imitalo
305 F. App'x 818 (Second Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Moreno-Montenegro
553 F. App'x 29 (Second Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Restrepo
547 F. App'x 34 (Second Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Oswaldo Cayasso
130 F. App'x 371 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Sepulveda v. United States
69 F. Supp. 2d 633 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
United States v. Mario Benitez
500 F. App'x 660 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Reynaldo Sosa-Valdespino v. United States
963 F.2d 347 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Brens
376 F. App'x 38 (Second Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Alejandro Sotelo
707 F. App'x 77 (Third Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Lopez
254 F. App'x 346 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Dean Drummond
277 F. App'x 906 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Arnaldo Gonzalez
648 F. App'x 747 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Ryan
209 F. App'x 300 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Mosquera-Prado
554 F. App'x 54 (Second Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Garzón-Londono
403 F. App'x 578 (Second Circuit, 2010)
United States v. James Malone
570 F. App'x 867 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Tyler
19 F. App'x 113 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 800, §2, 69 Stat. 685.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was not enacted as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 which comprises this chapter.
Section was formerly classified to section 1035 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Section was also formerly classified to section 198b of this title.
Codification
Section was not enacted as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 which comprises this chapter.
Section was formerly classified to section 1035 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
Section was also formerly classified to section 198b of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/968.