FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
Payments and advances
21 U.S.C. § 886
This text of 21 U.S.C. § 886 (Payments and advances) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 886.
Text
(a)Payment to informers
The Attorney General is authorized to pay any person, from funds appropriated for the Drug Enforcement Administration, for information concerning a violation of this subchapter, such sum or sums of money as he may deem appropriate, without reference to any moieties or rewards to which such person may otherwise be entitled by law.
(b)Reimbursement for purchase of controlled substances
Moneys expended from appropriations of the Drug Enforcement Administration for purchase of controlled substances and subsequently recovered shall be reimbursed to the current appropriation for the Administration.1
(c)Advance of funds for enforcement purposes
The Attorney General is authorized to direct the advance of funds by the Treasury Department in connection with the enforcement
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hopi Tribe v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 81 (Federal Claims, 2002)
United States v. Levenite
277 F.3d 454 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)
Garza v. United States
34 Fed. Cl. 1 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Robert W. Baucom v. John R. Martin, as District Attorney Pro Tem, Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit, Georgia
677 F.2d 1346 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
United States v. MacUla Anty
203 F.3d 305 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Clarence Hendrix
482 F.3d 962 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Allen v. United States
229 Ct. Cl. 515 (Court of Claims, 1981)
Hoch v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 39 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Thomas Taylor v. United States
550 F.2d 983 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
Rickard v. United States
11 Cl. Ct. 874 (Court of Claims, 1987)
United States v. Seventeen Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars in Currency, and Ronald A. Nocenti, Claimant-Appellant
524 F.2d 1105 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
Nicolas v. United States
35 Fed. Cl. 387 (Federal Claims, 1996)
United States v. Vincent Eric Harris
210 F.3d 165 (Third Circuit, 2000)
Sarlund v. United States
39 Fed. Cl. 803 (Federal Claims, 1998)
United States v. All Funds in Account Nos. 747.034/278, 747.009/278, & 747.714/278 in Banco Espanol De Credito, Spain
141 F. Supp. 2d 548 (District of Columbia, 2001)
United States v. All of the Inventories of the Businesses Known as Khalife Bros. Jewelry
806 F. Supp. 648 (E.D. Michigan, 1992)
Emmens v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 524 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Doe v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 367 (Federal Claims, 2000)
United States v. Alfred Brooks
419 F. App'x 476 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. FORTY FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS
596 F. Supp. 1308 (E.D. Missouri, 1984)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §516, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 96–132, §16(b), Nov. 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 1049; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6254(i), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4367.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
In subsec. (b), "Administration" substituted for "Bureau" as the probable intent of Congress in view of amendment by Pub. L. 96–132, which substituted references to the Drug Enforcement Administration for references to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs wherever appearing in text.
Amendments
1988—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–690 added subsec. (d).
1979—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 96–132 substituted "Drug Enforcement Administration" for "Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Reimbursement by Drug Enforcement Administration of Expenses Incurred To Remediate Methamphetamine Laboratories
Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXVI, §3672, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1246, provided that:
"(a) Reimbursement Authorized.—The Attorney General, acting through the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, may reimburse States, units of local government, Indian tribal governments, other public entities, and multi-jurisdictional or regional consortia thereof for expenses incurred to clean up and safely dispose of substances associated with clandestine methamphetamine laboratories which may present a danger to public health or the environment.
"(b) Additional DEA Personnel.—From amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this section, the Attorney General may hire not more than five additional Drug Enforcement Administration personnel to administer this section.
"(c) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out this section $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001."
Codification
In subsec. (b), "Administration" substituted for "Bureau" as the probable intent of Congress in view of amendment by Pub. L. 96–132, which substituted references to the Drug Enforcement Administration for references to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs wherever appearing in text.
Amendments
1988—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–690 added subsec. (d).
1979—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 96–132 substituted "Drug Enforcement Administration" for "Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Reimbursement by Drug Enforcement Administration of Expenses Incurred To Remediate Methamphetamine Laboratories
Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXVI, §3672, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1246, provided that:
"(a) Reimbursement Authorized.—The Attorney General, acting through the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, may reimburse States, units of local government, Indian tribal governments, other public entities, and multi-jurisdictional or regional consortia thereof for expenses incurred to clean up and safely dispose of substances associated with clandestine methamphetamine laboratories which may present a danger to public health or the environment.
"(b) Additional DEA Personnel.—From amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this section, the Attorney General may hire not more than five additional Drug Enforcement Administration personnel to administer this section.
"(c) Authorization of Appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out this section $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/886.