FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT

Employment or use of persons under 18 years of age in drug operations

21 U.S.C. § 861
Title21Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT
PartD

This text of 21 U.S.C. § 861 (Employment or use of persons under 18 years of age in drug operations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 861.

Text

(a)Unlawful acts It shall be unlawful for any person at least eighteen years of age to knowingly and intentionally—
(1)employ, hire, use, persuade, induce, entice, or coerce, a person under eighteen years of age to violate any provision of this subchapter or subchapter II;
(2)employ, hire, use, persuade, induce, entice, or coerce, a person under eighteen years of age to assist in avoiding detection or apprehension for any offense of this subchapter or subchapter II by any Federal, State, or local law enforcement official; or
(3)receive a controlled substance from a person under 18 years of age, other than an immediate family member, in violation of this subchapter or subchapter II.
(b)Penalty for first offense Any person who violates subsection (a) is subject to twice the maximum puni

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flores-Figueroa v. United States
556 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 2009)
571 case citations
United States v. Abraham Hernandez
330 F.3d 964 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
153 case citations
United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny Cruz
240 F.3d 127 (Second Circuit, 2001)
146 case citations
United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth
42 F.3d 1015 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
142 case citations
United States v. Gregory M. Thomas
114 F.3d 228 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
129 case citations
United States v. Courtney Butler (98-5552) and Julius Retic (98-5554)
207 F.3d 839 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
105 case citations
United States v. William G. Curtis and Jamell L. Rouson
324 F.3d 501 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
96 case citations
United States v. Eric L. Frazier, Jacoby Walker and Michael Mason
213 F.3d 409 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
89 case citations
United States v. Villanueva-Sotelo
515 F.3d 1234 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
82 case citations
United States v. Dunbar
553 F.3d 48 (First Circuit, 2009)
76 case citations
United States v. Lynard Joiner and James E. Collins, Also Known as Duke
183 F.3d 635 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
50 case citations
United States v. Andrew P. Chin
981 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
45 case citations
United States v. Smith
26 F.3d 739 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
42 case citations
United States v. Raul Martinez-Morel
118 F.3d 710 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
35 case citations
United States v. Isaac
655 F.3d 148 (Third Circuit, 2011)
29 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §420, formerly §405B, as added Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1102, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–10; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §§6452(b)(1), 6459, 6470(d), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4371, 4373, 4378; renumbered §420 and amended Pub. L. 101–647, title X, §§1002(c), 1003(c), title XXXV, §3599L, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4827, 4829, 4932.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
Section 4202 of title 18, referred to in subsec. (e), which, as originally enacted in Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, related to eligibility of prisoners for parole, was repealed and a new section 4202 enacted as part of the repeal and enactment of a new chapter 311 (§4201 et seq.) of Title 18, by Pub. L. 94–233, §2, Mar. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 219. For provisions relating to the eligibility of prisoners for parole, see section 4205 of Title 18. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§218(a)(5), 235(a)(1), (b)(1), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027, 2031, 2032, as amended, provided that, effective on the first day of the first calendar month beginning 36 months after Oct. 12, 1984 (Nov. 1, 1987), chapter 311 of Title 18 is repealed, subject to remaining effective for five years after Nov. 1, 1987, in certain circumstances. See Effective Date note set out under section 3551 of Title 18.

Codification
Section was classified to section 845b of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 101–647.

Amendments
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–647, §1003(c)(1), which directed the substitution of "is subject to twice the maximum punishment otherwise authorized" for "is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to twice that authorized, or up to twice the fine authorized, or both," was executed by making the substitution for "is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to twice that otherwise authorized, or up to twice the fine otherwise authorized, or both," to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–647, §3599L, substituted "has become final" for "have become final".
Pub. L. 101–647, §1003(c)(2), which directed the substitution of "is subject to three times the maximum punishment otherwise authorized" for "is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to three times that authorized, or up to three times the fine authorized, or both," was executed by making the substitution for "is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to three times that otherwise authorized, or up to three times the fine otherwise authorized, or both," to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1988—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 100–690, §6459, added par. (3).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–690, §6452(b)(1), struck out "or convictions" after "a prior conviction" and inserted at end "Penalties for third and subsequent convictions shall be governed by section 841(b)(1)(A) of this title."
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–690, §6470(d), struck out "required by section 841(b) of this title" after "mandatory term of imprisonment".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/861.