FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VI—COSMETICS

Misbranded cosmetics

21 U.S.C. § 362
Title21Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VI—COSMETICS

This text of 21 U.S.C. § 362 (Misbranded cosmetics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 362.

Text

A cosmetic shall be deemed to be misbranded—

(a)If its labeling is false or misleading in any particular.
(b)If in package form unless it bears a label containing (1) the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor;
(2)an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count; and (3) the information required under section 364e of this title: Provided, That under clause (2) of this paragraph reasonable variations shall be permitted, and exemptions as to small packages shall be established, by regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
(c)If any word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this chapter to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousn

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.
838 F.3d 958 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
446 case citations
Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial Group
783 F.3d 753 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
353 case citations
Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
8 F. Supp. 3d 467 (S.D. New York, 2014)
181 case citations
Zazu Designs, a Partnership v. L'oreal, S.A.
979 F.2d 499 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
151 case citations
In re Kind LLC "Healthy & All Natural" Litigation
209 F. Supp. 3d 689 (S.D. New York, 2016)
34 case citations
United States v. Article . Consisting of 216
409 F.2d 734 (Second Circuit, 1969)
30 case citations
Critcher v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
959 F.3d 31 (Second Circuit, 2020)
18 case citations
Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies
95 F. Supp. 3d 284 (D. Connecticut, 2015)
16 case citations
Helene Curtis v. National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc.
890 F. Supp. 152 (E.D. New York, 1995)
12 case citations
DESSERT BEAUTY, INC. v. Fox
617 F. Supp. 2d 185 (S.D. New York, 2007)
10 case citations
Astiana v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
905 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (N.D. California, 2012)
10 case citations
United States v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.
456 F. Supp. 973 (M.D. Florida, 1978)
9 case citations
Gonzalez v. L'OREAL USA, INC.
489 F. Supp. 2d 181 (N.D. New York, 2007)
9 case citations
United States v. Cartoned Bottles
409 F.2d 734 (Second Circuit, 1969)
1 case citations
Cosmetic, Toiletry & Fragrance Ass'n v. Schmidt
409 F. Supp. 57 (District of Columbia, 1976)
1 case citations
Parrott v. Family Dollar, Inc.
(N.D. Illinois, 2018)
Bojko v. Pierre Fabre USA Inc.
(N.D. Illinois, 2023)
Angela Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Attorney General Opinion No.
(Kansas Attorney General Reports, 2005)
Young v. L'oreal USA, Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2021)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §602, 52 Stat. 1054; Pub. L. 86–618, title I, §102(c)(2), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 398; Pub. L. 91–601, §6(f), formerly §7(f), Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1673, renumbered Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1205(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 716; Pub. L. 102–571, title I, §107(12), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4499; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title III, §3503(a)(3), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5858.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2022—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 117–328 added par. (3) before proviso.
1992—Par. (e). Pub. L. 102–571 substituted "379e" for "376".
1970—Par. (f). Pub. L. 91–601 added par. (f).
1960—Par. (e). Pub. L. 86–618 added par. (e).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2022 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 117–328 effective on the date that is 1 year after Dec. 29, 2022, see section 3503(b)(1) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a note under section 331 of this title.

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–601 effective Dec. 30, 1970, and regulations establishing special packaging standards effective no sooner than 180 days or later than one year from date regulations are final, or an earlier date published in Federal Register, see section 8 of Pub. L. 91–601, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1471 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

Effective Date of 1960 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 86–618 effective July 12, 1960, subject to the provisions of section 203 of Pub. L. 86–618, see section 202 of Pub. L. 86–618, set out as a note under section 379e of this title.

Effective Date; Postponement
Par. (b) effective Jan. 1, 1940, and such subsection effective July 1, 1940, as provided by regulations for certain lithographed labeling and containers bearing certain labeling, see act June 23, 1939, ch. 242, 53 Stat. 853, set out as an Effective Date; Postponement in Certain Cases note under section 301 of this title.

Construction; Confidentiality
Nothing in amendment made by Pub. L. 117–328, to be construed to authorize the disclosure of information that is prohibited from disclosure under section 331(j) of this title or section 1905 of title 18 or that is subject to withholding under section 552(b)(4) of title 5, see section 3503(c)(2) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a note under section 364 of this title.

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], and of Food and Drug Administration in the Department of Agriculture to Federal Security Agency, see notes set out under section 321 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/362.