FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—PROHIBITED ACTS AND PENALTIES

Injunction proceedings

21 U.S.C. § 332
Title21Food and Drugs
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—PROHIBITED ACTS AND PENALTIES

This text of 21 U.S.C. § 332 (Injunction proceedings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 332.

Text

(a)Jurisdiction of courts The district courts of the United States and the United States courts of the Territories shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown 1 to restrain violations of section 331 of this title, except paragraphs (h), (i), and (j).
(b)Violation of injunction In case of violation of an injunction or restraining order issued under this section, which also constitutes a violation of this chapter, trial shall be by the court, or, upon demand of the accused, by a jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee
531 U.S. 341 (Supreme Court, 2001)
935 case citations
Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.
387 U.S. 167 (Supreme Court, 1967)
433 case citations
Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.
384 U.S. 597 (Supreme Court, 1966)
375 case citations
United States v. Spectro Foods Corporation, a Corporation
544 F.2d 1175 (Third Circuit, 1976)
100 case citations
PhotoMedex, Inc. v. Irwin
601 F.3d 919 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
57 case citations
Robert Guy v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
812 F.2d 911 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
28 case citations
United States v. X-Otag Plus Tablets
441 F. Supp. 105 (D. Colorado, 1977)
18 case citations
United States v. Naremco, Inc.
553 F.2d 1138 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)
12 case citations
United States v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.
511 F. Supp. 958 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
9 case citations
United States v. Schmitt
734 F. Supp. 1035 (E.D. New York, 1990)
9 case citations
Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
596 F. Supp. 2d 1225 (S.D. Indiana, 2008)
8 case citations
Herbold Laboratory, Inc. And Milton Herbold v. United States
413 F.2d 342 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §302, 52 Stat. 1043; Pub. L. 87–781, title I, §103(d), title II, §201(c), Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 784, 793; Pub. L. 103–80, §3(d), Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 775.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–80, §3(d)(1), struck out ", and subject to the provisions of section 17 (relating to notice to opposite party) of the Act entitled 'An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes', approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 381)," after "for cause shown".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–80, §3(d)(2), struck out at end "Such trial shall be conducted in accordance with the practice and procedure applicable in the case of proceedings subject to the provisions of section 22 of such Act of October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 387)."
1962—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 87–781, §103(d), struck out "(e)," after "paragraphs".
Pub. L. 87–781, §201(c), struck out "(f)," after "paragraphs".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1962 Amendment
Amendment by section 103(c) of Pub. L. 87–781 effective on first day of seventh calendar month following October 1962, see section 107 of Pub. L. 87–781, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.
Pub. L. 87–781, title II, §203, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 793, provided that: "The amendments made by this title [amending this section and section 374 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 321 and 374 of this title] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 10, 1962]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/332.