20 U.S.C. § 1752 — Appeals from Federal district court transfer or transportation orders affecting school attendance areas and achieving balancing of students; postponement of Federal court orders pending exercise of appellate remedy; expiration of section

FEDERAL · 20 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSPORTATION OF STUDENTS

Appeals from Federal district court transfer or transportation orders affecting school attendance areas and achieving balancing of students; postponement of Federal court orders pending exercise of appellate remedy; expiration of section

20 U.S.C. § 1752

ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSPORTATION OF STUDENTS

This text of 20 U.S.C. § 1752 (Appeals from Federal district court transfer or transportation orders affecting school attendance areas and achieving balancing of students; postponement of Federal court orders pending exercise of appellate remedy; expiration of section) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

20 U.S.C. § 1752.

Text

Notwithstanding any other law or provision of law, in the case of any order on the part of any United States district court which requires the transfer or transportation of any student or students from any school attendance area prescribed by competent State or local authority for the purposes of achieving a balance among students with respect to race, sex, religion, or socioeconomic status, the effectiveness of such order shall be postponed until all appeals in connection with such order have been exhausted or, in the event no appeals are taken, until the time for such appeals has expired. This section shall expire at midnight on June 30, 1978.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Notwithstanding any other law or provision of law, in the case of any order on the part of any United States district court which requires the transfer or transportation of any student or students from any school attendance area prescribed by competent State or local authority for the purposes of achieving a balance among students with respect to race, sex, religion, or socioeconomic status, the effectiveness of such order shall be postponed until all appeals in connection with such order have been exhausted or, in the event no appeals are taken, until the time for such appeals has expired. This section shall expire at midnight on June 30, 1978.

United States v. School District of Ferndale, Michigan, Willie W. Sawyer, Thomas Plunkett, Robert Cicci, William Morris, Donald P. Flavin, Hanna Clampitt, Jon H. Kingsepp, William G. Coyne, the State of Michigan, William G. Milliken, Michigan State Board of Education, and John W. Porter, United States of America v. School District of the City of Ferndale, Michigan, William G. Coyne, State of Michigan, Michigan State Board of Education, and John W. Porter

577 F.2d 1339 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)

90 case citations

United States v. Price

577 F.2d 1356 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)

41 case citations

Evans v. Buchanan

416 F. Supp. 328 (D. Delaware, 1976)

37 case citations

Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home and School Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan

523 F.2d 917 (First Circuit, 1975)

27 case citations

United States v. School District of the City of Ferndale, Michigan

616 F.2d 895 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)

7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–380, title II, §253, Aug. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 519.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective on and after sixtieth day after Aug. 21, 1974, see section 2(c) of Pub. L. 93–380, set out as a note under section 1221–1 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 U.S.C. § 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/20/1752.