FEDERAL · 20 U.S.C. · Chapter 38
Interpretation of "program or activity"
20 U.S.C. § 1687
Title20 — Education
Chapter38 — DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEX OR BLINDNESS
This text of 20 U.S.C. § 1687 (Interpretation of "program or activity") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
20 U.S.C. § 1687.
Text
For the purposes of this chapter, the term "program or activity" and "program" mean all of the operations of—
(1)(A) a department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or of a local government; or
(B)the entity of such State or local government that distributes such assistance and each such department or agency (and each other State or local government entity) to which the assistance is extended, in the case of assistance to a State or local government;
(2)(A) a college, university, or other postsecondary institution, or a public system of higher education; or
(B)a local educational agency (as defined in section section 1 7801 of this title), system of vocational education, or other school system;
(3)(A) an entire corporation, partnership, or other privat
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
491 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District
524 U.S. 274 (Supreme Court, 1998)
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey
499 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1991)
National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Smith
525 U.S. 459 (Supreme Court, 1999)
Amy Cohen v. Brown University
991 F.2d 888 (First Circuit, 1993)
Bridget O'COnnOr v. James Davis, Dr., Rockland Psychiatric Center, and State of New York
126 F.3d 112 (Second Circuit, 1997)
R.M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Renee M. Smith
139 F.3d 180 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Horner v. Kentucky High School Athletic Ass'n
43 F.3d 265 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
Doe v. Claiborne County ex rel. Claiborne County Board of Education
103 F.3d 495 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
Elwell v. Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Board of Regents
693 F.3d 1303 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, Pa
998 F.2d 168 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Aurelia Davis, A/n/f of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education, Charles Dumas and Bill Querry
74 F.3d 1186 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Communities for Equity v. Michigan High School Athletic Association
459 F.3d 676 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Adam Barbour v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, United States of America, Intervenor
374 F.3d 1161 (D.C. Circuit, 2004)
Purcell v. N.Y. Inst. of Tech. Coll. of Osteopathic Med.
931 F.3d 59 (Second Circuit, 2019)
Romero v. City of New York
839 F. Supp. 2d 588 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Smith v. Metropolitan School District Perry Township
128 F.3d 1014 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
McCormick ex rel. Geldwert v. School District of Mamaroneck
370 F.3d 275 (Second Circuit, 2004)
Equity in Athletics, Inc. v. Department of Education
675 F. Supp. 2d 660 (W.D. Virginia, 2009)
R. M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
266 F.3d 152 (Third Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 92–318, title IX, §908, as added Pub. L. 100–259, §3(a), Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 28; amended Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(g), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4023; Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1076(j), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2091; Pub. L. 114–95, title IX, §9215(bb), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2173.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IX of Pub. L. 92–318 which enacted this chapter and amended sections 203 and 213 of Title 29, Labor, and sections 2000c, 2000c–6, 2000c–9, and 2000h–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of title IX to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1681 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2015—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 114–95 substituted "section 7801 of this title), system of vocational education, or other school system;" for "7801 of this title), system of vocational education, or other school system;".
2002—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 107–110 substituted "7801" for "8801".
1994—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 103–382 substituted "section 8801" for "section 2854(a)(10)".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2015 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–110 effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6301 of this title.
Findings of Congress
Pub. L. 100–259, §2, Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 28, provided that: "The Congress finds that—
"(1) certain aspects of recent decisions and opinions of the Supreme Court have unduly narrowed or cast doubt upon the broad application of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C. 794], the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 [42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.], and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.]; and
"(2) legislative action is necessary to restore the prior consistent and long-standing executive branch interpretation and broad, institution-wide application of those laws as previously administered."
Construction
Pub. L. 100–259, §7, Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 31, provided that: "Nothing in the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note under section 1681 of this title] shall be construed to extend the application of the Acts so amended [Education Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. 92–318, see Short Title of 1972 Amendment, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq., Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq., and Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq.] to ultimate beneficiaries of Federal financial assistance excluded from coverage before the enactment of this Act [Mar. 22, 1988]."
Abortion Neutrality
This section not to be construed to force or require any individual or hospital or any other institution, program, or activity receiving Federal funds to perform or pay for an abortion, see section 8 of Pub. L. 100–259, set out as a note under section 1688 of this title.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IX of Pub. L. 92–318 which enacted this chapter and amended sections 203 and 213 of Title 29, Labor, and sections 2000c, 2000c–6, 2000c–9, and 2000h–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of title IX to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1681 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2015—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 114–95 substituted "section 7801 of this title), system of vocational education, or other school system;" for "7801 of this title), system of vocational education, or other school system;".
2002—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 107–110 substituted "7801" for "8801".
1994—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 103–382 substituted "section 8801" for "section 2854(a)(10)".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2015 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–110 effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6301 of this title.
Findings of Congress
Pub. L. 100–259, §2, Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 28, provided that: "The Congress finds that—
"(1) certain aspects of recent decisions and opinions of the Supreme Court have unduly narrowed or cast doubt upon the broad application of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C. 794], the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 [42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.], and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.]; and
"(2) legislative action is necessary to restore the prior consistent and long-standing executive branch interpretation and broad, institution-wide application of those laws as previously administered."
Construction
Pub. L. 100–259, §7, Mar. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 31, provided that: "Nothing in the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note under section 1681 of this title] shall be construed to extend the application of the Acts so amended [Education Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. 92–318, see Short Title of 1972 Amendment, set out as a note under section 1001 of this title, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq., Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq., and Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq.] to ultimate beneficiaries of Federal financial assistance excluded from coverage before the enactment of this Act [Mar. 22, 1988]."
Abortion Neutrality
This section not to be construed to force or require any individual or hospital or any other institution, program, or activity receiving Federal funds to perform or pay for an abortion, see section 8 of Pub. L. 100–259, set out as a note under section 1688 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 U.S.C. § 1687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/20/1687.