FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—OPERATION AND REVIEW

Judicial review

2 U.S.C. § 922
Title2The Congress
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—OPERATION AND REVIEW

This text of 2 U.S.C. § 922 (Judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 922.

Text

(a)Expedited review
(1)Any Member of Congress may bring an action, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief on the ground that any order that might be issued pursuant to section 904 of this title violates the Constitution.
(2)Any Member of Congress, or any other person adversely affected by any action taken under this title,1 may bring an action, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief concerning the constitutionality of this title.1
(3)Any Member of Congress may bring an action, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that the terms of an order issued under section

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowsher v. Synar
478 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1986)
832 case citations
United States v. Patterson
25 F.4th 123 (Second Circuit, 2022)
16 case citations
Synar v. United States
670 F. Supp. 410 (District of Columbia, 1987)
3 case citations
Community Oncology Alliance v. OMB
987 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Circuit, 2021)
3 case citations
United States v. Mayfield
134 F.4th 1101 (Tenth Circuit, 2025)
1 case citations
Bonelli v. United States
(D. Arizona, 2019)
(HC) Louthian v. United States
(E.D. California, 2023)
(HC)Brundidge v. Trate
(E.D. California, 2024)
United States v. Jesse Tullies
(Third Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Joseph Olinsky
(Third Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Michael A. Diaz
(Eleventh Circuit, 2011)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §274, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1098; Pub. L. 100–119, title I, §102(b)(9), (10), Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 774, 775; Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10211, Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 711.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This title, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), (3), means title II (§200 et seq.) of Pub. L. 99–177, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1038, known as the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 900 of this title and Tables.
Section 906(a) of this title, referred to in subsec. (d)(1)(A), was repealed by Pub. L. 111–139, title I, §10(a), Feb. 12, 2010, 124 Stat. 21.

Amendments
1997—Subsec. (a)(1), (3). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(1), substituted "section 904" for "section 902".
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(1), substituted "section 904" for "section 902(b)" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(1)(A). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(2), substituted "906(a) of this title if" for "907(1) of this title to the extent that" and inserted "or" at end.
Subsec. (d)(1)(B). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(3), substituted "budgetary resources" for "new budget authority, new loan guarantee commitments, new direct loan obligations, or spending authority". Directory language directing the striking of "or" after the comma was executed by striking "or" after "account," and not after "activity," to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (d)(1)(C). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(4), struck out subpar. (C) which read as follows: "does not reduce obligation limitations by the amount by which such limitations are required to be reduced under subchapter I of this chapter (or reduces such limitations by more than that amount) with respect to any program, project, activity, or account,".
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(1), substituted "section 904" for "section 902(b)" in introductory and concluding provisions.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(1), substituted "section 904" for "section 902".
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(5), redesignated subsec. (g) as (f) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (f) consisting of pars. (1) to (5) relating to alternative procedures for joint reports of directors.
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(6), substituted "figures" for "base levels of total revenues and total budget outlays, as" and "section 904 of this title" for "section 901(a)(2)(B) or (c)(2) of this title,".
Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(5), redesignated subsec. (h) as (g). Former subsec. (g) redesignated (f).
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 105–33, §10211(5), redesignated subsec. (h) as (g).
1987—Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 100–119, §102(b)(9)(A), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "In the event that any of the reporting procedures described in section 901 of this title are invalidated, then any report of the Directors referred to in section 901(a) or (c)(1) of this title shall be transmitted to the joint committee established under this subsection."
Subsec. (f)(2), (3). Pub. L. 100–119, §102(b)(9)(B), substituted "Director of CBO" for "Directors" wherever appearing.
Subsec. (f)(5). Pub. L. 100–119, §102(b)(9)(C), substituted "section 901(a)(2)(B) or (c)(2)" for "section 901(b) or (c)(2)".
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100–119, §102(b)(10), substituted "and economic assumptions" for ", assumptions, and methodologies", "Director of OMB" for "Comptroller General" in two places, and "section 901(a)(2)(B)" for "section 901(b)".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/922.