FEDERAL · 2 U.S.C. · Chapter 9A

Functions

2 U.S.C. § 285b
Title2The Congress
Chapter9A — OFFICE OF LAW REVISION COUNSEL

This text of 2 U.S.C. § 285b (Functions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2 U.S.C. § 285b.

Text

The functions of the Office shall be as follows:

(1)To prepare, and submit to the Committee on the Judiciary one title at a time, a complete compilation, restatement, and revision of the general and permanent laws of the United States which conforms to the understood policy, intent, and purpose of the Congress in the original enactments, with such amendments and corrections as will remove ambiguities, contradictions, and other imperfections both of substance and of form, separately stated, with a view to the enactment of each title as positive law.
(2)To examine periodically all of the public laws enacted by the Congress and submit to the Committee on the Judiciary recommendations for the repeal of obsolete, superfluous, and superseded provisions contained therein.
(3)To prepare and pub

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Preston v. Heckler
734 F.2d 1359 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
63 case citations
Gonzalez v. Village of West Milwaukee
671 F.3d 649 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)
41 case citations
Lyons v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. Salaried Employees Retirement Plan
221 F.3d 1235 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
38 case citations
United States v. Loniello
610 F.3d 488 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
17 case citations
United States v. Duane Ehmer
87 F.4th 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
8 case citations
Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.
200 A.3d 1244 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
6 case citations
Preston v. Schweiker
555 F. Supp. 886 (D. Alaska, 1983)
6 case citations
Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Co.
228 F. Supp. 3d 797 (E.D. Michigan, 2017)
5 case citations
Panjiva, Inc. v. U.S. Customs & Border Prot.
342 F. Supp. 3d 481 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
4 case citations
Turner, Henry v. Glickman, Daniel R.
207 F.3d 419 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
1 case citations
Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Adelson
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
Jerry L. Lyons v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
221 F.3d 1235 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
Howard University Hospital v. DC DOES and James M. Lyles
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019)
Revocation of Prior Monument Designations
(Office of Legal Counsel, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 94–386, §1, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1170.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
Section is based on section 205(c) of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.

Amendments
1976—Par. (6). Pub. L. 94–386 substituted "through publication of the fifth annual cumulative supplement to the 1973 edition of such Code" for "until such time as the District of Columbia Self–Government and Governmental Reorganization Act becomes effective".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Preparation and Publication of District of Columbia Code Under Direction of Council of the District of Columbia
Pub. L. 94–386, §2, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1170, provided that:
"(a) After publication by the Law Revision Counsel of the fifth annual cumulative supplement to the 1973 edition of the District of Columbia Code, new editions of the District of Columbia Code (and annual cumulative supplements thereto) shall be prepared and published under the direction of the Council of the District of Columbia and shall set forth the general and permanent laws relating to or in force in the District of Columbia, whether enacted by the Congress or by the Council of the District of Columbia, except such laws as are of application in the District of Columbia by reason of being laws of the United States general and permanent in nature.
"(b) After completion of the printing of the fifth annual cumulative supplement to the 1973 edition of the District of Columbia Code, the Public Printer [now Director of the Government Publishing Office] shall, as the Council of the District of Columbia may request, either—
"(1) furnish to the Council of the District of Columbia, on such terms as the Public Printer [now Director of the Government Publishing Office] (in consultation with the Joint Committee on Printing) deems appropriate, the type used in preparing the 1973 edition of the District of Columbia Code and the fifth annual cumulative supplement to such edition; or
"(2) make such arrangements with the Council of the District of Columbia as the Public Printer [now Director of the Government Publishing Office] (in consultation with the Joint Committee on Printing) deems appropriate for the printing by the Government Printing Office [now Government Publishing Office] of future editions of the District of Columbia Code, and annual cumulative supplements thereto, prepared under the direction of the Council of the District of Columbia."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 U.S.C. § 285b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/2/285b.