FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Antidumping duties imposed
19 U.S.C. § 1673
This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1673 (Antidumping duties imposed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1673.
Text
If—
(1)the administering authority determines that a class or kind of foreign merchandise is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than its fair value, and
(2)the Commission determines that—
(A)an industry in the United States—
(i)is materially injured, or
(ii)is threatened with material injury, or
(B)the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded,
by reason of imports of that merchandise or by reason of sales (or the likelihood of sales) of that merchandise for importation,
then there shall be imposed upon such merchandise an antidumping duty, in addition to any other duty imposed, in an amount equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price (or the constructed export price) for the merchandise. For purposes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Torrington Co. v. United States
68 F.3d 1347 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Smith-Corona Group v. United States
713 F.2d 1568 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States
36 F.3d 1565 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
Cemex, S.A. v. United States
133 F.3d 897 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
BMW of N. Am. LLC v. United States
926 F.3d 1291 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
American Alloys, Inc. v. United States
30 F.3d 1469 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
Texas Crushed Stone Co. v. United States
35 F.3d 1535 (Federal Circuit, 1994)
Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States
857 F.3d 1363 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United States
77 F.3d 426 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Grupo Industrial Camesa v. United States
85 F.3d 1577 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
AOC International, Ltd. v. United States
99 F.3d 1576 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
In re Escalera Resources Co.
563 B.R. 336 (D. Colorado, 2017)
The Torrington Company v. United States v. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Defendants/cross-Appellants v. Ntn Bearing Corporation of America, American Ntn Bearing Manufacturing Corporation and Ntn Corporation, and Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation
82 F.3d 1039 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited v. United States
56 F.4th 1345 (Federal Circuit, 2023)
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. United States
949 F.3d 710 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
PT. Zinus Glob. Indonesia v. United States
628 F. Supp. 3d 1252 (Court of International Trade, 2023)
Skf USA Inc. And Skf Gmbh v. Ina Walzlager Schaeffler Kg and Ina Bearing Company, Inc., and Fag Kugelfischer Georg Schaefer Ag and Fag Bearings Corporation v. United States, and Ntn Bearing Corporation of America and Ntn Kugellagerfabrik (Deutschland) Gmbh v. The Torrington Company
180 F.3d 1370 (Federal Circuit, 1999)
The Timken Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States v. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. And Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., and Ntn Bearing Corporation of America, American Ntn Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, Ntn Bower Corporation, Ntn Corporation, Nsk Ltd., and Nsk Corporation
354 F.3d 1334 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Echjay Forgings Pvt. Ltd. v. United StatesPublic version posted 10/08/2020.
475 F. Supp. 3d 1350 (Court of International Trade, 2020)
Alloy Piping Products, Inc. v. Kanzen Tetsu Sdn. Bhd.
334 F.3d 1284 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
Source Credit
History
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §731, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 162; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §602(b), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3024; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §233(a)(1)(A), (2)(A)(i), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4898.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "normal value exceeds the export price (or the constructed export price)" for "foreign market value exceeds the United States price" in concluding provisions.
1984—Pub. L. 98–573 inserted "or by reason of sales (or the likelihood of sales) of that merchandise for importation" after "by reason of imports of that merchandise" in par. (2), and inserted sentence at end providing that for purposes of this section and section 1673d(b)(1) of this title, a reference to the sale of foreign merchandise includes the entering into of any leasing arrangement regarding the merchandise that is equivalent to the sale of the merchandise.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 applicable with respect to investigations initiated by petition or by the administering authority under parts I and II of this subtitle, and to reviews begun under section 1675 of this title, on or after Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(b)(1) of Pub. L. 98–573, as amended, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date
Part effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 107 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "normal value exceeds the export price (or the constructed export price)" for "foreign market value exceeds the United States price" in concluding provisions.
1984—Pub. L. 98–573 inserted "or by reason of sales (or the likelihood of sales) of that merchandise for importation" after "by reason of imports of that merchandise" in par. (2), and inserted sentence at end providing that for purposes of this section and section 1673d(b)(1) of this title, a reference to the sale of foreign merchandise includes the entering into of any leasing arrangement regarding the merchandise that is equivalent to the sale of the merchandise.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 applicable with respect to investigations initiated by petition or by the administering authority under parts I and II of this subtitle, and to reviews begun under section 1675 of this title, on or after Oct. 30, 1984, see section 626(b)(1) of Pub. L. 98–573, as amended, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date
Part effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 107 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1673.