FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Seizure; prosecution 1

19 U.S.C. § 1604
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIII
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartV

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1604 (Seizure; prosecution 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1604.

Text

It shall be the duty of the Attorney General of the United States immediately to inquire into the facts of cases reported to him by customs officers and the laws applicable thereto, and if it appears probable that any fine, penalty, or forfeiture has been incurred by reason of such 1 violation, for the recovery of which the institution of proceedings in the United States district court or the Court of International Trade is necessary, forthwith to cause the proper proceedings to be commenced and prosecuted, without delay, for the recovery of such fine, penalty, or forfeiture in such case provided, unless, upon inquiry and examination, the Attorney General decides that such proceedings can not probably be sustained or that the ends of public justice do not require that they should be instit

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars
461 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1983)
552 case citations
Gerardo Serrano v. U.S. Customs and Border
975 F.3d 488 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
123 case citations
States Marine Lines, Inc. v. George P. Shultz, Secretary of the Treasury
498 F.2d 1146 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
103 case citations
People v. One 1998 GMC
2011 IL 110236 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2011)
77 case citations
United States v. One 1971 BMW 4-Door Sedan
652 F.2d 817 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
38 case citations
Ruby Nnadi v. Robert Richter, District Director, United States Customs Service
976 F.2d 682 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
35 case citations
Crocker v. United States
37 Fed. Cl. 191 (Federal Claims, 1997)
35 case citations
Sarkisian v. United States
472 F.2d 468 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)
33 case citations
State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027
522 N.W.2d 457 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
31 case citations
United States v. One Carton Positive Motion Picture Film Entitled "491"
367 F.2d 889 (Second Circuit, 1966)
30 case citations
United States v. One 1972 Mercedes-Benz 250
545 F.2d 1233 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
29 case citations
United States v. Eight (8) Rhodesian Stone Statues
449 F. Supp. 193 (C.D. California, 1978)
20 case citations
Boston v. Stephens
395 F. Supp. 1000 (S.D. Ohio, 1975)
18 case citations
United States v. One (1) Douglas A-26B Aircraft
436 F. Supp. 1292 (S.D. Georgia, 1977)
17 case citations
Kirkland v. State Ex Rel. Baxley
340 So. 2d 1121 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
16 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §604, 46 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(bb), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 96–417, title VI, §610, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1746.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
As enacted by act June 17, 1930, the catchline for this section was "Same—prosecution", as this section was intended to be read as a continuation of the provisions introduced in sections 1602 and 1603 of this title. The use of "such" in text is meant to refer back to section 1603 of this title.

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §604, 42 Stat. 984. That section was superseded by section 604 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Prior provisions substantially similar in effect, with a further provision for an allowance for expenses and services, were contained in R.S. §3085. Provisions requiring district attorneys to cause investigations to be made before a United States commissioner and to initiate and prosecute proper proceedings to recover fines and penalties were contained in act June 22, 1874, ch. 391, §15, 18 Stat. 189. Both of these sections were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §§642, 643, 42 Stat. 989.
The 1922 act also superseded a provision contained in R.S. §3087, requiring collectors to cause suits to be commenced without delay and prosecuted to effect.

Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 substituted "the Attorney General of the United States" and "the Attorney General" for "every United States district attorney" and "such district attorney", respectively, and authorized institution of proceedings in the Court of International Trade.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted reference to customs officers for reference to collectors.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1604.