FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Judicial enforcement
19 U.S.C. § 1510
This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1510 (Judicial enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1510.
Text
(a)Order of court
If any person summoned under section 1509 of this title does not comply with the summons, the district court of the United States for any district in which such person is found or resides or is doing business, upon application and after notice to any such person and hearing, shall have jurisdiction to issue an order requiring such person to comply with the summons. Failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof and such court may assess a monetary penalty.
(b)Sanctions
(1)For so long as any person, after being adjudged guilty of contempt for neglecting or refusing to obey a lawful summons issued under section 1509 of this title and for refusing to obey the order of the court, remains in contempt, the Secretary may—
(A)prohi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.
864 F.2d 1219 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Rubin
97 F.3d 373 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Modes, Inc.
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 627 (Court of International Trade, 1993)
United States v. Israel Rubin, as President of I.D. Enterprises, Inc. I.D. Enterprises
2 F.3d 974 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Optrex America, Inc.
560 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (Court of International Trade, 2008)
United States v. Frowein
727 F.2d 227 (Second Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Molt
444 F. Supp. 491 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
United States v. Rainbow Rugs, Inc.
838 F. Supp. 11 (D. Maine, 1993)
Ford Motor Co. v. United States
254 F. Supp. 3d 1297 (Court of International Trade, 2017)
United States v. Ben Tan
16 F.4th 1346 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7428, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,251 United States of America v. Israel Rubin, as President of I.D. Enterprises, Inc. I.D. Enterprises, Inc.
97 F.3d 373 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Optrex Am., In
2008 CIT 63 (Court of International Trade, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §510, 46 Stat. 733; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(o), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 290; Pub. L. 95–410, title I, §106, Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §616, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2179.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
Provisions substantially the same as those in this section were contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, §III, P, 38 Stat. 188, which substantially reenacted the provisions of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, §17, 26 Stat. 139, as renumbered and reenacted without other change by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, §23, 36 Stat. 100. Section III, P, of the 1913 act was superseded by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §509, 42 Stat. 968, and repealed by section 643 thereof. Section 509 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 510 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Prior provisions similar to those in this section were contained in R.S. §§2923, 2924, prior to repeal by section 29 of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, 26 Stat. 141.
Amendments
1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–182 inserted before period at end "and such court may assess a monetary penalty".
1978—Pub. L. 95–410 substituted judicial enforcement provisions covering court order for compliance with administrative summonses and imposition of specified sanctions for prior provisions covering imposition of penalties for refusal to give testimony, including provision for a penalty of not less than $20 nor more than $500 for refusing to appear or to produce documents or to subscribe his name to a deposition or refusing to answer interrogatories; deeming the last made appraisement of the merchandise as final where an owner, importer, or consignee failed to comply with the examination provisions; deeming the person falsely swearing on an examination guilty of perjury; and forfeiture of the merchandise where the person was an owner, importer, or consignee, or the recovery of its value from him.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted references to appropriate customs officer for references to collector or appraiser wherever appearing, and struck out references to divisions of United States Customs Court.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
Prior Provisions
Provisions substantially the same as those in this section were contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, §III, P, 38 Stat. 188, which substantially reenacted the provisions of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, §17, 26 Stat. 139, as renumbered and reenacted without other change by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, §23, 36 Stat. 100. Section III, P, of the 1913 act was superseded by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §509, 42 Stat. 968, and repealed by section 643 thereof. Section 509 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 510 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Prior provisions similar to those in this section were contained in R.S. §§2923, 2924, prior to repeal by section 29 of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, 26 Stat. 141.
Amendments
1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–182 inserted before period at end "and such court may assess a monetary penalty".
1978—Pub. L. 95–410 substituted judicial enforcement provisions covering court order for compliance with administrative summonses and imposition of specified sanctions for prior provisions covering imposition of penalties for refusal to give testimony, including provision for a penalty of not less than $20 nor more than $500 for refusing to appear or to produce documents or to subscribe his name to a deposition or refusing to answer interrogatories; deeming the last made appraisement of the merchandise as final where an owner, importer, or consignee failed to comply with the examination provisions; deeming the person falsely swearing on an examination guilty of perjury; and forfeiture of the merchandise where the person was an owner, importer, or consignee, or the recovery of its value from him.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted references to appropriate customs officer for references to collector or appraiser wherever appearing, and struck out references to divisions of United States Customs Court.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1510.