FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Examination of merchandise

19 U.S.C. § 1499
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleIII
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartIII

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1499 (Examination of merchandise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1499.

Text

(a)Entry examination Imported merchandise that is required by law or regulation to be inspected, examined, or appraised shall not be delivered from customs custody (except under such bond or other security as may be prescribed by the Secretary to assure compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and instructions which the Secretary or the Customs Service is authorized to enforce) until the merchandise has been inspected, appraised, or examined and is reported by the Customs Service to have been truly and correctly invoiced and found to comply with the requirements of the laws of the United States. The Customs Service—
(A)shall designate the packages or quantities of merchandise covered by any invoice or entry which are to be opened and examined for the purpose of appraisement or o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
552 U.S. 214 (Supreme Court, 2008)
656 case citations
United States v. Slocum
708 F.2d 587 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
92 case citations
United States v. Howard Cotterman
709 F.3d 952 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
91 case citations
United States v. Claude Nolan Harold
588 F.2d 1136 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
13 case citations
Plastilite Corp. v. Kassnar Imports
508 F.2d 824 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1975)
12 case citations
Precise Imports Corp. v. Kelly
378 F.2d 1014 (Second Circuit, 1967)
11 case citations
United States v. One 1976 Mercedes 450 SLC
667 F.2d 1171 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
10 case citations
Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United States
579 F.2d 617 (Court of Claims, 1978)
8 case citations
CDCOM (U.S.A.) International, Inc. v. United States
21 Ct. Int'l Trade 435 (Court of International Trade, 1997)
8 case citations
National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Ass'n of America v. United States
18 Ct. Int'l Trade 754 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
7 case citations
Tempco Marketing v. United States
21 Ct. Int'l Trade 191 (Court of International Trade, 1997)
6 case citations
Cbb Group, Inc. v. United States
783 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (Court of International Trade, 2011)
5 case citations
Matsushita Electric Co. v. Zeigler
158 F.3d 1167 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
4 case citations
Zojirushi America Corp. v. United States
180 F. Supp. 3d 1354 (Court of International Trade, 2016)
4 case citations
Libas, Ltd. v. United States
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1215 (Court of International Trade, 1996)
4 case citations
Grover Melvin Mungo, Samuel Harris and Daniel Simms, Jr. v. United States
423 F.2d 1351 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)
3 case citations
Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. v. The United States
403 F.2d 282 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1968)
1 case citations
United States v. Marti
321 F. Supp. 59 (E.D. New York, 1970)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §499, 46 Stat. 728; June 25, 1938, ch. 679, §§15, 16(a), 52 Stat. 1084; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, §301(k), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 289; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §613(a), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2171.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §499, 42 Stat. 965. That section was superseded by section 499 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
A prior provision prohibiting delivery of merchandise liable to be inspected or appraised, until it had been inspected or appraised, or until the packages sent to be inspected or appraised, should be found correctly invoiced, and be so reported, with a further provision as to the taking of bonds conditioned for delivery of the merchandise, and the forfeiture of such bonds, was contained in R.S. §2899.
Provisions substantially similar to those in this section concerning the number of packages to be examined (not including the provision for designation of a less number by the Secretary of the Treasury) and concerning packages found to contain articles not specified in the invoice, with a further provision for remission of the forfeiture, were contained in R.S. §2901.
A prior provision, concerning deficiencies somewhat similar to that in this section, was contained in R.S. §2921.
A special provision concerning the number of packages to be examined and appraised at the port of New York was contained in R.S. §2939.
A provision concerning returns by weighers, gaugers, and measurers, was contained in R.S. §2890.
All of the foregoing sections of the Revised Statutes were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, §642, 42 Stat. 989.

Amendments
1993—Pub. L. 103–182 amended section generally, substituting present provisions for provisions which required imported merchandise to be inspected, examined, appraised, and reported by appropriate customs officer to have been truly and correctly invoiced and found to comply with requirements of laws of the United States prior to release of such merchandise from customs custody.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted references to appropriate customs officer or such officer for references to collector or appraiser wherever appearing, and struck out references to duties of appraiser.
1938—Act June 25, 1938, amended section generally and among other changes inserted provision relating to invalidity of appraisements made after effective date of Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 91–271, see section 203 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 1500 of this title.

Effective Date of 1938 Amendment
Amendment by act June 25, 1938, effective on thirtieth day following June 25, 1938, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 37 of act June 25, 1938, set out as a note under section 1401 of this title.

Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

Existing Laboratories
Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, §613(b), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2174, which related to accreditation of private testing laboratories, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, §601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78, effective on the date the USMCA entered into force (July 1, 2020).

Executive Documents

Transfer of Functions
Functions of all other officers of Department of the Treasury and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Treasury, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions, by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 1281, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1499.