FEDERAL · 19 U.S.C. · Chapter 4

Testimony and production of papers

19 U.S.C. § 1333
Title19Customs Duties
SubtitleII
Chapter4 — TARIFF ACT OF 1930
PartII

This text of 19 U.S.C. § 1333 (Testimony and production of papers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
19 U.S.C. § 1333.

Text

(a)Authority to obtain information For the purposes of carrying out its functions and duties in connection with any investigation authorized by law, the commission or its duly authorized agent or agents (1) shall have access to and the right to copy any document, paper, or record, pertinent to the subject matter under investigation, in the possession of any person, firm, copartnership, corporation, or association engaged in the production, importation, or distribution of any article under investigation, (2) may summon witnesses, take testimony, and administer oaths, (3) may require any person, firm, copartnership, corporation, or association to produce books or papers relating to any matter pertaining to such investigation, and (4) may require any person, firm, copartnership, corporation,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.
411 F.3d 245 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
29 case citations
Lowell Sun Co. v. Fleming
120 F.2d 213 (First Circuit, 1941)
22 case citations
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States
734 F.3d 1306 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
18 case citations
Jepson, Inc. v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd.
30 F.3d 854 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
17 case citations
Fleming v. Lowell Sun Co.
36 F. Supp. 320 (D. Massachusetts, 1940)
16 case citations
Hall v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
858 N.E.2d 955 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2006)
7 case citations
SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border Protection
583 F.3d 1340 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
5 case citations
Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. United States
350 F. Supp. 3d 1325 (Court of International Trade, 2018)
5 case citations
National Labor Relations Board v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.
438 F.3d 1198 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
4 case citations
United States International Trade Commission v. E. & J. Gallo Winery
637 F. Supp. 1262 (District of Columbia, 1985)
3 case citations
Awp Industries, Inc. v. United States
783 F. Supp. 2d 1266 (Court of International Trade, 2011)
2 case citations
United States International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.
355 F. Supp. 2d 67 (District of Columbia, 2004)
1 case citations
Podziewski v. Cabras Marine Corporation
(Northern Mariana Islands, 2024)
Cap One, Inc. v. MV Sierra Rose
(E.D. California, 2021)
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United States
11 Ct. Int'l Trade 76 (Court of International Trade, 1987)
Pay Less Here, LLC v. United States
2025 CIT 50 (Court of International Trade, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title III, §333, 46 Stat. 699; June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(b), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 85–686, §9(a), (b), Aug. 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 679; Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §229, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §174, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2011; Pub. L. 101–382, title I, §135(a), Aug. 20, 1990, 104 Stat. 651.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
As originally enacted subsec. (b) contained a reference to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Act June 25, 1936, substituted "the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia" for "the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia", and act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" for "district court of the United States for the District of Columbia". However, the words "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" have been deleted entirely as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district", and section 88 of Title 28 which states that "the District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 8, 1916, ch. 463, §706, 39 Stat. 797, as amended by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §318(f), 42 Stat. 947. These acts were superseded by section 333 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and section 318(f) of the 1922 act was repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Amendments
1990—Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 101–382 added subsec. (h).
1975—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 93–618, §174(1), substituted "At the request of" for "Upon application of the Attorney General of the United States, at the request of".
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 93–618, §174(2), added subsec. (g).
1970—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 91–452 struck out provisions relating to the immunity from prosecution of any natural person compelled to testify or produce evidence in obedience to the subpoena of the commission.
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–686, §9(a), substituted "For the purposes of carrying out its functions and duties in connection with any investigation authorized by law" for "For the purposes of carrying Part II of this subtitle into effect", inserted provisions empowering the commission to require any person, firm, copartnership, corporation, or association to furnish in writing, in such detail and in such form as the commission may prescribe, information in their possession pertaining to an investigation.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 85–686, §9(b), substituted "pending before the commission" for "pending under Part II of this subtitle".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, and not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, see section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S.C. § 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/19/1333.