FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 45

Protection of property occupied by foreign governments

18 U.S.C. § 970
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter45 — FOREIGN RELATIONS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 970 (Protection of property occupied by foreign governments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 970.

Text

(a)Whoever willfully injures, damages, or destroys, or attempts to injure, damage, or destroy, any property, real or personal, located within the United States and belonging to or utilized or occupied by any foreign government or international organization, by a foreign official or official guest, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(b)Whoever, willfully with intent to intimidate, coerce, threaten, or harass—
(1)forcibly thrusts any part of himself or any object within or upon that portion of any building or premises located within the United States, which portion is used or occupied for official business or for diplomatic, consular, or residential purposes by—
(A)a foreign government, including such use as a mission to an international org

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William R. Perl
584 F.2d 1316 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
37 case citations
United States v. Victor Vancier
515 F.2d 1378 (Second Circuit, 1975)
36 case citations
United States v. Woods
102 F.4th 760 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
7 case citations
United States v. Frederick G. Norton
808 F.2d 908 (First Circuit, 1987)
5 case citations
United States v. Henry Skrypeck and Joan K. Cavanagh
505 F.2d 458 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
1 case citations
United States v. Segers
(District of Columbia, 2018)
United States v. Grabinski
(District of Columbia, 2025)
United States v. Yefei Wen
(Ninth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Alazo
(District of Columbia, 2023)
United States v. Mahoney-Smith
(District of Columbia, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 92–539, title IV, §401, Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1073; amended Pub. L. 94–467, §7, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 2000; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500" in concluding provisions.
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
1976—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 94–467 added subsec. (b), redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c), and struck out reference to section 1116(c) of this title.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177, title IV, §406(b)(1)(A), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 244, added item 987.
2000—Pub. L. 106–185, §§2(b), 7(b), Apr. 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 210, 215, added items 983 and 985.
1992—Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §§1522(b), 1523(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4063, 4064, added items 984 and 986.
1988—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7069, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405, substituted "forfeiture" for "Forfeiture" in items 981 and 982.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/970.