FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 45
Private correspondence with foreign governments
18 U.S.C. § 953
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter45 — FOREIGN RELATIONS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 953 (Private correspondence with foreign governments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 953.
Text
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.
499 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Pennsylvania v. Nelson
350 U.S. 497 (Supreme Court, 1956)
United States v. Andrew M. Harvey, III
2 F.3d 1318 (Third Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Harvey I. Silverman
745 F.2d 1386 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Murphy
50 M.J. 4 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.
231 F. Supp. 72 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Philip Agee v. Edmund S. Muskie, Secretary of State
629 F.2d 80 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Coplin v. United States
6 Cl. Ct. 115 (Court of Claims, 1984)
United States v. Peace Information Center
97 F. Supp. 255 (District of Columbia, 1951)
United States v. Murphy
30 M.J. 1040 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1990)
ITT World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
699 F.2d 1219 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Martin v. Young
134 F. Supp. 204 (N.D. California, 1955)
Copeland v. Secretary of State
226 F. Supp. 20 (S.D. New York, 1964)
United States v. Elliott
266 F. Supp. 318 (S.D. New York, 1967)
United States v. Flynn
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Ackers v. Kerry
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Roeder v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Strunk v. New York Province of the Society of Jesus
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Officers of the United States Within the Meaning of the Appointments Clause
(Office of Legal Counsel, 2007)
The President's Compliance with the "Timely Notification" Requirement of Section 501(b) of the National Security Act
(Office of Legal Counsel, 1986)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §5 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §5, 35 Stat. 1088; Apr. 22, 1932, ch. 126, 47 Stat. 132).
The reference to any citizen or resident within the jurisdiction of the United States not duly authorized "who counsels, advises or assists in such correspondence with such intent" was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of principal in section 2.
Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.
Minor changes of arrangement and in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in first par.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §5 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §5, 35 Stat. 1088; Apr. 22, 1932, ch. 126, 47 Stat. 132).
The reference to any citizen or resident within the jurisdiction of the United States not duly authorized "who counsels, advises or assists in such correspondence with such intent" was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of principal in section 2.
Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.
Minor changes of arrangement and in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in first par.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/953.