FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 44
Remedy for erroneous denial of firearm
18 U.S.C. § 925A
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 925A (Remedy for erroneous denial of firearm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 925A.
Text
Any person denied a firearm pursuant to subsection (s) or (t) of section 922—
(1)due to the provision of erroneous information relating to the person by any State or political subdivision thereof, or by the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act; or
(2)who was not prohibited from receipt of a firearm pursuant to subsection (g) or (n) of section 922,
may bring an action against the State or political subdivision responsible for providing the erroneous information, or responsible for denying the transfer, or against the United States, as the case may be, for an order directing that the erroneous information be corrected or that the transfer be approved, as the case may be. In any action under this section
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patrick Atkinson v. Merrick B. Garland
70 F.4th 1018 (Seventh Circuit, 2023)
Robinson v. New Jersey Mercer County Vicinage-Family Division
514 F. App'x 146 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Koog v. United States
79 F.3d 452 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Enos v. Holder
855 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (E.D. California, 2012)
Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Port Authority
730 F.3d 252 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Ross v. Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives
903 F. Supp. 2d 333 (D. Maryland, 2012)
Eibler v. DEPARTMENT OF TREAS., BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS
311 F. Supp. 2d 618 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
Brent Smith v. United States
63 F.4th 677 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
Kenneth Voneida v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
508 F. App'x 152 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Tamez v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Umbert v. United States of America
(District of Columbia, 2023)
Sedita v. United States of America
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Mach v. Garland
(E.D. Kentucky, 2025)
Brinson v. Garland
(N.D. California, 2023)
Yoo v. FBI NICS
(N.D. Texas, 2021)
Daniels v. US Department of Justice
(W.D. Missouri, 2023)
Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association v. Attorney General New Jersey
(Third Circuit, 2024)
Humphrey v. The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations
(D. Alaska, 2023)
Ragan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation National Instant Criminal Background Check System Section
(D. Maryland, 2025)
Bowen v. United States
(S.D. Georgia, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 103–159, title I, §104(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1543.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, referred to in par. (1), is section 103 of Pub. L. 103–159, which is classified to section 40901 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
References in Text
Section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, referred to in par. (1), is section 103 of Pub. L. 103–159, which is classified to section 40901 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 925A, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/925A.