FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 31
Court officers generally
18 U.S.C. § 645
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter31 — EMBEZZLEMENT AND THEFT
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 645 (Court officers generally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 645.
Text
Whoever, being a United States marshal, clerk, receiver, referee, trustee, or other officer of a United States court, or any deputy, assistant, or employee of any such officer, retains or converts to his own use or to the use of another or after demand by the party entitled thereto, unlawfully retains any money coming into his hands by virtue of his official relation, position or employment, is guilty of embezzlement and shall, where the offense is not otherwise punishable by enactment of Congress, be fined under this title or not more than double the value of the money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the amount embezzled does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
It sh
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carter v. United States
530 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Southern Union Co. v. United States
132 S. Ct. 2344 (Supreme Court, 2012)
United States v. Thomas Chisolm Bartsh
69 F.3d 864 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. George William Blood (04-5101) and Stephen L. Crittenden (04-5261)
435 F.3d 612 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Sherman Sharpe
996 F.2d 125 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Clyde R. Goad
490 F.2d 1158 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh
985 F.2d 930 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Bengis
783 F.3d 407 (Second Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Robert Worthington
822 F.2d 315 (Second Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Collier
68 F. App'x 676 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Boyd v. Wilmington Trust Co.
630 F. Supp. 2d 379 (D. Delaware, 2009)
Breeden v. Bennett (In Re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.)
367 B.R. 302 (N.D. New York, 2007)
Wion
189 Ct. Cl. 572 (Court of Claims, 1969)
In re Woodford
214 A.D.2d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
United States v. Crittenden
(Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Fury v. Waage
(M.D. Florida, 2020)
Abor v. Russell
(N.D. Texas, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 726; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), (2)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147, 2148; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §186 (May 29, 1920, ch. 212, 41 Stat. 630).
The smaller punishment for an offense involving $100 or less was inserted to conform to section 641 of this title which represents a later expression of congressional intent.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".
1994—Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(2)(G), substituted "be fined under this title or not more than double the value of the money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned" for "be fined not more than double the value of the money so embezzled or imprisoned".
Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(H), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" after "he shall be".
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §186 (May 29, 1920, ch. 212, 41 Stat. 630).
The smaller punishment for an offense involving $100 or less was inserted to conform to section 641 of this title which represents a later expression of congressional intent.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".
1994—Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(2)(G), substituted "be fined under this title or not more than double the value of the money so embezzled, whichever is greater, or imprisoned" for "be fined not more than double the value of the money so embezzled or imprisoned".
Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(H), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" after "he shall be".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/645.