FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 27

Removing goods from customs custody; breaking seals

18 U.S.C. § 549

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 549 (Removing goods from customs custody; breaking seals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 549.

Text

Whoever, without authority, affixes or attaches a customs seal, fastening, or mark, or any seal, fastening, or mark purporting to be a customs seal, fastening, or mark to any vessel, vehicle, warehouse, or package; or Whoever, without authority, willfully removes, breaks, injures, or defaces any customs seal or other fastening or mark placed upon any vessel, vehicle, warehouse, or package containing merchandise or baggage in bond or in customs custody; or Whoever maliciously enters any bonded warehouse or any vessel or vehicle laden with or containing bonded merchandise with intent unlawfully to remove therefrom any merchandise or baggage therein, or unlawfully removes any merchandise or baggage in such vessel, vehicle, or bonded warehouse or otherwise in customs custody or control; or Who

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. United States
327 U.S. 711 (Supreme Court, 1946)
223 case citations
O'BRIEN v. United States
386 U.S. 345 (Supreme Court, 1967)
117 case citations
United States v. William J. Johnson
718 F.2d 1317 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
101 case citations
United States v. Slocum
708 F.2d 587 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
92 case citations
United States v. Charles Green
523 F.2d 229 (Second Circuit, 1975)
80 case citations
United States v. Madell Collins
349 F.2d 863 (Second Circuit, 1965)
50 case citations
United States v. Yuri Izurieta
710 F.3d 1176 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
48 case citations
United States v. Hugo Sarmiento, Thomas K. Fahey, Alfonso Irribarren
744 F.2d 755 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
40 case citations
United States v. Gernie
228 F. Supp. 329 (S.D. New York, 1964)
39 case citations
United States v. Dominic Daniel Alrdo
380 F.2d 103 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)
37 case citations
Clarence Ernest Beardslee, A/K/A Clarence Everett Beardslee v. United States
387 F.2d 280 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
26 case citations
United States v. Edward Joseph Foley and John Joseph Edler
735 F.2d 45 (Second Circuit, 1984)
25 case citations
United States v. Garber, Marvin, United States of America v. Denucci, Nicholas
626 F.2d 1144 (Third Circuit, 1980)
24 case citations
United States v. Michael J. Indelicato
800 F.2d 1482 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
18 case citations
Bingham v. City of Manhattan Beach
329 F.3d 723 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
16 case citations
United States v. Claude Nolan Harold
588 F.2d 1136 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
13 case citations
United States v. O'BRIEN
255 F. Supp. 755 (E.D. Michigan, 1965)
13 case citations
United States v. One 1976 Mercedes 450 SLC
667 F.2d 1171 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
10 case citations
United States v. Agnello
367 F. Supp. 444 (E.D. New York, 1973)
10 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 717; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §311(e), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 242.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on section 1598 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §598, 46 Stat. 752; June 25, 1938, ch. 679, §26, 52 Stat. 1089).
Reference to persons causing, procuring, aiding or assisting was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.
In view of definition of felony in section 1 of this title words "guilty of a felony" were omitted. (See reviser's note under section 550 of this title.)
The punishment prescribed by section 545 of this title was inserted to make this section complete without reference to another section. In doing so it was necessary to rephrase the punishment provision of section 545 of this title, as originally enacted, without change of substance.
Forfeiture provision was omitted to conform with current administrative practice.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177 substituted "10 years" for "two years" in last par.
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in last par.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/549.