FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 21
Power of court
18 U.S.C. § 401
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter21 — CONTEMPTS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 401 (Power of court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 401.
Text
A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—
(1)Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice;
(2)Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions;
(3)Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hutto v. Finney
437 U.S. 678 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Frank v. United States
395 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court, 1969)
United States v. Christopher Love
449 F.3d 1154 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Kouri Perez
187 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 1999)
In the Matter of Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 1975. Appeal of Abraham E. Freedman
529 F.2d 543 (Third Circuit, 1976)
Hilao v. Estate of Marcos
25 F.3d 1467 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Clark Equipment Company v. Lift Parts Manufacturing Company Incorporated
972 F.2d 817 (Seventh Circuit, 1992)
In Re Door. In Re Rothman
195 F.2d 766 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Stefena Brown v. United States
234 F.2d 140 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)
State v. Murray
623 A.2d 60 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
United States v. Rick Waggoner
103 F.3d 724 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Barry Bonds
784 F.3d 582 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
In Re Schleper
585 F.2d 1367 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
Arata v. Nu Skin International, Inc.
96 F.3d 1265 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Kelly v. Carr
691 F.2d 800 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
Nelson H. Weade v. Trailways of New England, Inc.
325 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
United States v. McVeigh
896 F. Supp. 1549 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1995)
Griffin v. County School Board Of Prince Edward County
363 F.2d 206 (Fourth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Robert Lee and E. B. Siegel
404 F.2d 68 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Yates
107 F. Supp. 412 (S.D. California, 1952)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3002(a)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on section 385 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §268, 36 Stat. 1163).
Said section 385 conferred two powers. The first part authorizing courts of the United States to impose and administer oaths will remain in title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary. The second part relating to contempt of court constitutes this section.
Changes in phraseology and arrangement were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted "or both," after "fine or imprisonment," in introductory provisions.
Based on section 385 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §268, 36 Stat. 1163).
Said section 385 conferred two powers. The first part authorizing courts of the United States to impose and administer oaths will remain in title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary. The second part relating to contempt of court constitutes this section.
Changes in phraseology and arrangement were made.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted "or both," after "fine or imprisonment," in introductory provisions.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/401.