FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 19

Conspiracy to impede or injure officer

18 U.S.C. § 372

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 372 (Conspiracy to impede or injure officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 372.

Text

If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.
547 F.2d 1329 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
266 case citations
United States v. Brown
669 F.3d 10 (First Circuit, 2012)
106 case citations
United States v. Enriquito Alsondo
486 F.2d 1339 (Second Circuit, 1973)
43 case citations
United States v. Gerhard
615 F.3d 7 (First Circuit, 2010)
41 case citations
United States v. Mark O. Henry
136 F.3d 12 (First Circuit, 1998)
26 case citations
United States v. Johannes Weber
320 F.3d 1047 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
18 case citations
United States v. Davis
6 C.M.A. 34 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
13 case citations
Lawrence Murphy, Jr. v. United States
481 F.2d 57 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
13 case citations
United States v. Jeffries
45 F.R.D. 110 (District of Columbia, 1968)
11 case citations
United States v. Beale
574 F.3d 512 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
10 case citations
United States v. Hazard
8 C.M.A. 530 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
9 case citations
United States v. John Hopper
436 F. App'x 414 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
8 case citations
Nagy v. George
286 F. App'x 135 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
4 case citations
United States v. Virgil Talley
315 F. App'x 134 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
3 case citations
United States v. Grunewald
162 F. Supp. 626 (S.D. New York, 1958)
2 case citations
United States v. Parrett
872 F. Supp. 910 (D. Utah, 1994)
United States v. Tarrio
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Minuta v. Rosalez
(W.D. Texas, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(d)(1)(D), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §54 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §21, 35 Stat. 1092).
Scope of section was enlarged to cover all possessions of the United States. When the section was first enacted in 1861 there were no possessions, and hence the use of the words "State or Territory" was sufficient to describe the area then subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The word "District" was inserted by the codifiers of the 1909 Criminal Code.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "under this title" for "not more than $5,000".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/372.