FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 223
Litigation concerning sources of evidence
18 U.S.C. § 3504
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter223 — WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3504 (Litigation concerning sources of evidence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3504.
Text
(a)In any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States—
(1)upon a claim by a party aggrieved that evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act, the opponent of the claim shall affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act;
(2)disclosure of information for a determination if evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, shall not be required unless such information may be relevant to a pending claim of su
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Francisco Toscanino
500 F.2d 267 (Second Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Cara Woods, Jr.
544 F.2d 242 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States of America
516 F.2d 594 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings of Robert W. Beverly v. United States
468 F.2d 732 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Mark Lawrence Alter
482 F.2d 1016 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Bernard James See
505 F.2d 845 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. William Fred Phillips
540 F.2d 319 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. William Harvey Park
531 F.2d 754 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. John William Butenko and Igor A. Ivanov. Appeal of Igor A. Ivanov
494 F.2d 593 (Third Circuit, 1974)
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Douglas Stevens
510 F.2d 1101 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
In Re United States of America v. Jane Kember and Morris Budlong, Mary Sue Hubbard, Henning Heldt, Richard Weigand, and Gregory Willardson
648 F.2d 1354 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. David Chun
503 F.2d 533 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. William Prentis Tucker, Daisy Bell Hughes, and Ronald H. Jackson
526 F.2d 279 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
In Re Daniel Ellsberg
446 F.2d 954 (First Circuit, 1971)
In Re Grand Jury Investigation, Philip Charles Testa, Witness. Appeal of Philip Charles Testa
486 F.2d 1013 (Third Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Donald Dien
598 F.2d 743 (Second Circuit, 1979)
In the Matter of Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 1975. Appeal of Abraham E. Freedman
529 F.2d 543 (Third Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Michael Kazuo Yanagita and Marc Choyei Kondo
552 F.2d 940 (Second Circuit, 1977)
In Re Francis Joseph Millow
529 F.2d 770 (Second Circuit, 1976)
Russell Bufalino v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
473 F.2d 728 (Third Circuit, 1973)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §702(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 935.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Congressional Statement of Findings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §701, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 935, provided that: "The Congress finds that claims that evidence offered in proceedings was obtained by the exploitation of unlawful acts, and is therefore inadmissible in evidence, (1) often cannot reliably be determined when such claims concern evidence of events occurring years after the allegedly unlawful act, and (2) when the allegedly unlawful act has occurred more than five years prior to the event in question, there is virtually no likelihood that the evidence offered to prove the event has been obtained by the exploitation of that allegedly unlawful act."
Applicability to Proceedings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §703, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936, provided that: "This title [enacting this section and provisions set as notes under this section] shall apply to all proceedings, regardless of when commenced, occurring after the date of its enactment [Oct. 15, 1970]. Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 3504, chapter 223, title 18, United States Code, shall not apply to any proceeding in which all information to be relied upon to establish inadmissibility was possessed by the party making such claim and adduced in such proceeding prior to such enactment."
Congressional Statement of Findings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §701, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 935, provided that: "The Congress finds that claims that evidence offered in proceedings was obtained by the exploitation of unlawful acts, and is therefore inadmissible in evidence, (1) often cannot reliably be determined when such claims concern evidence of events occurring years after the allegedly unlawful act, and (2) when the allegedly unlawful act has occurred more than five years prior to the event in question, there is virtually no likelihood that the evidence offered to prove the event has been obtained by the exploitation of that allegedly unlawful act."
Applicability to Proceedings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §703, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936, provided that: "This title [enacting this section and provisions set as notes under this section] shall apply to all proceedings, regardless of when commenced, occurring after the date of its enactment [Oct. 15, 1970]. Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 3504, chapter 223, title 18, United States Code, shall not apply to any proceeding in which all information to be relied upon to establish inadmissibility was possessed by the party making such claim and adduced in such proceeding prior to such enactment."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3504.