FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 213
Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations
18 U.S.C. § 3288
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter213 — LIMITATIONS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3288 (Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3288.
Text
Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, in the event of an appeal, within 60 days of the date the dismissal of the indictment or information becomes final, or, if no regular grand jury is in session in the appropriate jurisdiction when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next regular grand jury is convened, which new indictment shall not be barred by any statute of limitations. This section does not permit the filing of a new indictment or information whe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Arthur J. Porth
426 F.2d 519 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Moshe Milstein
401 F.3d 53 (Second Circuit, 2005)
United States v. S. Robert Davis
873 F.2d 900 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Robert E. Smith (98-5888) Kathy Burch (98-5894) Raymond Burch (98-5895) Danny Eakles (98-5898) Deborah Eakles (98-5939)
197 F.3d 225 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Albert Friedman
649 F.2d 199 (Third Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Rodgers
8 C.M.A. 226 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Nelson Italiano
894 F.2d 1280 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Leslie B. Ponder, Jr.
444 F.2d 816 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. William Edward Beard, United States of America v. Harold Garrison
414 F.2d 1014 (Third Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Williams
511 F.3d 1044 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Howard Lee Wilks
629 F.2d 669 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
Peter Kenneth Demarrias v. United States
487 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Rabb, Wade Lee
680 F.2d 294 (Third Circuit, 1982)
United States v. James Mathurin
868 F.3d 921 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Nicholas Garcia and John O'valle, Jr.
268 F.3d 407 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Michael J. Peloquin and James J. Edwards
810 F.2d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Bert
814 F.3d 70 (Second Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Dennis Garcia
412 F.2d 999 (Tenth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Ward M. Wilsey
458 F.2d 11 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 88–139, §2, Oct. 16, 1963, 77 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 88–520, §1, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7081(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4407.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§556a, 587, 589 (Apr. 30, 1934, ch. 170, §1, 48 Stat. 648; May 10, 1934, ch. 278, §§1, 3, 48 Stat. 772; July 10, 1940, ch. 567, 54 Stat. 747).
This section is a consolidation of sections 556a, 587, and 589 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., without change of substance. (See reviser's note under section 3289 of this title.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–690, in section catchline, substituted "Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations" for "Indictment where defect found after period of limitations", and in text, substituted "Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason" for "Whenever an indictment is dismissed for any error, defect, or irregularity with respect to the grand jury, or an indictment or information filed after the defendant waives in open court prosecution by indictment is found otherwise defective or insufficient for any cause,", inserted ", or, in the event of an appeal, within 60 days of the date the dismissal of the indictment or information becomes final" after "dismissal of the indictment or information", and inserted provisions which prohibited filing of new indictment or information where reason for dismissal was failure to file within period prescribed or some other reason that would bar a new prosecution.
1964—Pub. L. 88–520 substituted "Indictment" for "Reindictment" in section catchline, included indictments or informations filed after the defendant waives in open court prosecution by indictment which are dismissed for any error, defect, or irregularity, or are otherwise found defective or insufficient, and substituted provisions authorizing the return of a new indictment in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, if no regular grand jury is in session when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next grand jury is convened, for provisions which authorized the return of a new indictment not later than the end of the next succeeding regular session of the court, following the session at which the indictment was found defective or insufficient, during which a grand jury shall be in session.
1963—Pub. L. 88–139 substituted "session" for "term" wherever appearing.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§556a, 587, 589 (Apr. 30, 1934, ch. 170, §1, 48 Stat. 648; May 10, 1934, ch. 278, §§1, 3, 48 Stat. 772; July 10, 1940, ch. 567, 54 Stat. 747).
This section is a consolidation of sections 556a, 587, and 589 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., without change of substance. (See reviser's note under section 3289 of this title.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–690, in section catchline, substituted "Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations" for "Indictment where defect found after period of limitations", and in text, substituted "Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason" for "Whenever an indictment is dismissed for any error, defect, or irregularity with respect to the grand jury, or an indictment or information filed after the defendant waives in open court prosecution by indictment is found otherwise defective or insufficient for any cause,", inserted ", or, in the event of an appeal, within 60 days of the date the dismissal of the indictment or information becomes final" after "dismissal of the indictment or information", and inserted provisions which prohibited filing of new indictment or information where reason for dismissal was failure to file within period prescribed or some other reason that would bar a new prosecution.
1964—Pub. L. 88–520 substituted "Indictment" for "Reindictment" in section catchline, included indictments or informations filed after the defendant waives in open court prosecution by indictment which are dismissed for any error, defect, or irregularity, or are otherwise found defective or insufficient, and substituted provisions authorizing the return of a new indictment in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information, or, if no regular grand jury is in session when the indictment or information is dismissed, within six calendar months of the date when the next grand jury is convened, for provisions which authorized the return of a new indictment not later than the end of the next succeeding regular session of the court, following the session at which the indictment was found defective or insufficient, during which a grand jury shall be in session.
1963—Pub. L. 88–139 substituted "session" for "term" wherever appearing.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3288.