FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 212
Definitions
18 U.S.C. § 3267
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter212 — MILITARY EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3267 (Definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3267.
Text
As used in this chapter:
(1)The term "employed by the Armed Forces outside the United States" means—
(A)employed as—
(i)a civilian employee of—
(I)the Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department); or
(II)any other Federal agency, or any provisional authority, to the extent such employment relates to supporting the mission of the Department of Defense overseas;
(ii)a contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier) of—
(I)the Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department); or
(II)any other Federal agency, or any provisional authority, to the extent such employment relates to supporting the mission of the Department of Defense overseas; or
(iii)an employee of a contractor (or subcontractor at
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Ali
71 M.J. 256 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
United States v. Under Seal
709 F.3d 257 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Nicholas Slatten
865 F.3d 767 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Rico Williams
836 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Latasha Lorraine Arnt, A/K/A Latasha Lorraine Simpson and Latasha L. Cummings
474 F.3d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Emilio Moran
70 F.4th 797 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Williams
825 F. Supp. 2d 117 (District of Columbia, 2011)
United States v. Civilian ALAA MOHAMMAD ALI
70 M.J. 514 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2011)
United States v. Flaming
133 F.4th 1011 (Tenth Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Arnt
(Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Naik
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 106–523, §2(a), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2491; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1088, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2066.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2004—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 108–375 amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: "employed as a civilian employee of the Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department), as a Department of Defense contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier), or as an employee of a Department of Defense contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier);".
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–316, §2(a)(1), (b)(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1593, 1594, struck out "TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS" before "OFFENSES" in chapter heading and added item 3273.
Amendments
2004—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 108–375 amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: "employed as a civilian employee of the Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department), as a Department of Defense contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier), or as an employee of a Department of Defense contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier);".
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–316, §2(a)(1), (b)(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1593, 1594, struck out "TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS" before "OFFENSES" in chapter heading and added item 3273.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3267.