FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 211
Jurisdiction of State of Kansas over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations
18 U.S.C. § 3243
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter211 — JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3243 (Jurisdiction of State of Kansas over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3243.
Text
Jurisdiction is conferred on the State of Kansas over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations, including trust or restricted allotments, within the State of Kansas, to the same extent as its courts have jurisdiction over offenses committed elsewhere within the State in accordance with the laws of the State.
This section shall not deprive the courts of the United States of jurisdiction over offenses defined by the laws of the United States committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McGirt v. Oklahoma
591 U. S. 894 (Supreme Court, 2020)
Negonsott v. Samuels
507 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta
597 U.S. 629 (Supreme Court, 2022)
United States v. Violet Bruce
394 F.3d 1215 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Steve A. Burch
169 F.3d 666 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Youngbear v. Brewer
415 F. Supp. 807 (N.D. Iowa, 1976)
Emery L. Negonsott v. Harold Samuels and the Attorney General of the State of Kansas
933 F.2d 818 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Finn
919 F. Supp. 1305 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
Shawnee Tribe v. United States
423 F.3d 1204 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Oyler v. Finney
870 F. Supp. 1018 (D. Kansas, 1994)
Iowa Tribe of Indians of Kansas and Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. State of Kansas
787 F.2d 1434 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
State v. Oyler
803 P.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1990)
Burdett v. Harrah's Kansas Casino Corp.
260 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (D. Kansas, 2003)
Lambert v. Workman
594 F.3d 1260 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)
Wyandotte Nation v. Sebelius
337 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Kansas, 2004)
Rodewald v. Kansas Department of Revenue
297 P.3d 281 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2013)
Negonsott v. Samuels
696 F. Supp. 561 (D. Kansas, 1988)
United States v. Papakee
485 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (N.D. Iowa, 2007)
In re Jimmie
887 P.2d 81 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1994)
Attorney General Opinion No.
(Kansas Attorney General Reports, 1999)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 827.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on section 217a of title 25, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Indians (June 8, 1940, ch. 276, 54 Stat. 249).
The attention of Congress is directed to consideration of the question whether this section should be broadened and made applicable to all states rather than only to Kansas. Such change was not regarded as within the scope of this revision.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on section 217a of title 25, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Indians (June 8, 1940, ch. 276, 54 Stat. 249).
The attention of Congress is directed to consideration of the question whether this section should be broadened and made applicable to all states rather than only to Kansas. Such change was not regarded as within the scope of this revision.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3243.