FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 209

Fugitives from State or Territory to State, District, or Territory

18 U.S.C. § 3182

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3182 (Fugitives from State or Territory to State, District, or Territory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3182.

Text

Whenever the executive authority of any State or Territory demands any person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority of any State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State or Territory, charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime, certified as authentic by the governor or chief magistrate of the State or Territory from whence the person so charged has fled, the executive authority of the State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled shall cause him to be arrested and secured, and notify the executive authority making such demand, or the agent of such authority appointed to receive the fugitive, and shall cause the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michigan v. Doran
439 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1978)
639 case citations
Brown v. Nutsch
619 F.2d 758 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
48 case citations
Wilbanks v. State
579 P.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1978)
36 case citations
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Salvador Santiago Ortiz, Jr.
427 F.2d 1043 (Third Circuit, 1970)
28 case citations
People ex rel. Strachan v. Colon
571 N.E.2d 65 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
22 case citations
Commonwealth ex rel. Bonomo v. Haas
236 A.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
17 case citations
United States ex rel. Grano v. Anderson
446 F.2d 272 (Third Circuit, 1971)
14 case citations
United States ex rel. Grano v. Anderson
318 F. Supp. 263 (D. Delaware, 1970)
11 case citations
In re the Extradition of Singh
123 F.R.D. 108 (D. New Jersey, 1987)
10 case citations
White v. Armontrout
29 F.3d 357 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
7 case citations
Chavers v. State
143 So. 2d 187 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1962)
6 case citations
Boothe v. State
180 So. 2d 450 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
6 case citations
Breckenridge v. Hindman
691 P.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1984)
5 case citations
Wolfe v. Au
686 P.2d 16 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1984)
5 case citations
Johnson v. Peterson
466 P.2d 183 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1970)
3 case citations
Bergen v. Carson
417 So. 2d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
3 case citations
Long v. Cauthron
731 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1987)
3 case citations
Grant v. Shobe
524 P.2d 550 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
3 case citations
Colfax County Board of County Commissioners v. New Hampshire
16 F.3d 1107 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
3 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 822; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(9), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §662 (R.S. §5278).
Last sentence as to costs and expenses to be paid by the demanding authority was incorporated in section 3195 of this title.
Word "District" was inserted twice to make section equally applicable to fugitives found in the District of Columbia.
"Thirty days" was substituted for "six months" since, in view of modern conditions, the smaller time is ample for the demanding authority to act.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 inserted comma after "District" in section catchline and in two places in text.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3182.