FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 121
Exclusivity of remedies
18 U.S.C. § 2708
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter121 — STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2708 (Exclusivity of remedies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2708.
Text
The remedies and sanctions described in this chapter are the only judicial remedies and sanctions for nonconstitutional violations of this chapter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Brown
302 Neb. 53 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
United States v. Perrine
518 F.3d 1196 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
155 F.3d 1051 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Timothy Sanders
819 F.3d 880 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Javier Guerrero
768 F.3d 351 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Sims, Christian Vernon
569 S.W.3d 634 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2019)
United States v. Kennedy
81 F. Supp. 2d 1103 (D. Kansas, 2000)
In Re the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Release of Prospective Cell Site Information
407 F. Supp. 2d 134 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Hepting v. AT & T Corp.
439 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. California, 2006)
Chapman v. Lawson
89 F. Supp. 3d 959 (S.D. Ohio, 2015)
Commonwealth v. Dougalewicz
113 A.3d 817 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Bansal v. Russ
513 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
In re Smartphone Geolocation Data Application
977 F. Supp. 2d 129 (E.D. New York, 2013)
United States v. Sherr
400 F. Supp. 2d 843 (D. Maryland, 2005)
State v. Brown
202 A.3d 1003 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)
United States v. Michael Powell
444 F. App'x 517 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Kelley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
67 F. Supp. 3d 240 (District of Columbia, 2014)
United States v. Jones
908 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
236 F.3d 1035 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Ferguson
508 F. Supp. 2d 7 (District of Columbia, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 99–508, title II, §201[(a)], Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1867.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in the case of conduct pursuant to a court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders or extensions made after such effective date, see section 202 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2701 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in the case of conduct pursuant to a court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders or extensions made after such effective date, see section 202 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2701 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2708.