FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 119

Enforcement of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act

18 U.S.C. § 2522
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter119 — WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2522 (Enforcement of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2522.

Text

(a)Enforcement by Court Issuing Surveillance Order.—If a court authorizing an interception under this chapter, a State statute, or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) or authorizing use of a pen register or a trap and trace device under chapter 206 or a State statute finds that a telecommunications carrier has failed to comply with the requirements of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, the court may, in accordance with section 108 of such Act, direct that the carrier comply forthwith and may direct that a provider of support services to the carrier or the manufacturer of the carrier's transmission or switching equipment furnish forthwith modifications necessary for the carrier to comply.
(b)Enforcement Upon Application by Attorne

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Eddie Eugene Norris
159 F.3d 926 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
93 case citations
United States v. Bistline
665 F.3d 758 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
72 case citations
Commonwealth v. Miller
787 A.2d 1036 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
45 case citations
United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
227 F.3d 450 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
35 case citations
United States v. David Gary Gawthrop
310 F.3d 405 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
32 case citations
United States v. Leonard
64 M.J. 381 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2007)
25 case citations
Kroh v. Kroh
567 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
10 case citations
United States v. Moriarty
962 F. Supp. 217 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
8 case citations
United States v. Richard Bistline
605 F. App'x 529 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
2 case citations
United States v. David Turner
687 F. App'x 520 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
1 case citations
United States v. Robert Elliott
110 F.4th 974 (Seventh Circuit, 2024)
1 case citations
LeVay v. Morken
(E.D. Michigan, 2021)
Gremmels v. Apple Inc.
(N.D. California, 2025)
United States v. Marco Barraza
(Eighth Circuit, 2021)
Maycock v. USA-2255
(D. Maryland, 2024)
United States v. Norris
(Fifth Circuit, 1998)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 103–414, title II, §201(a), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4289.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 95–511, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1783, which is classified principally to chapter 36 (§1801 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1801 of Title 50 and Tables.
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is title I of Pub. L. 103–414, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4279, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§1001 et seq.) of chapter 9 of Title 47, Telecommunications. Sections 102 and 108 of the Act are classified to sections 1001 and 1007, respectively, of Title 47. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 47 and Tables.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2522.