FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 119

Confiscation of wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepting devices

18 U.S.C. § 2513
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter119 — WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2513 (Confiscation of wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepting devices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2513.

Text

Any electronic, mechanical, or other device used, sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed, sold, or advertised in violation of section 2511 or section 2512 of this chapter may be seized and forfeited to the United States. All provisions of law relating to (1) the seizure, summary and judicial forfeiture, and condemnation of vessels, vehicles, merchandise, and baggage for violations of the customs laws contained in title 19 of the United States Code, (2) the disposition of such vessels, vehicles, merchandise, and baggage or the proceeds from the sale thereof, (3) the remission or mitigation of such forfeiture, (4) the compromise of claims, and (5) the award of compensation to informers in respect of such forfeitures, shall apply to seizures and forfeitures incurred, or alleged to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John A. Betts v. United States
10 F.3d 1278 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
77 case citations
United States v. Ronald D. Chick
61 F.3d 682 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
45 case citations
United States v. Ford
553 F.2d 146 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
34 case citations
Abu-Shawish v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 812 (Federal Claims, 2015)
18 case citations
United States v. Thomas Mills, Sr.
773 F.3d 563 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
11 case citations
United States v. $633,021.67 in United States Currency
842 F. Supp. 528 (N.D. Georgia, 1993)
11 case citations
United States v. Richard Lee Bast and Redex Corporation
495 F.2d 138 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
7 case citations
United States v. Lambus
221 F. Supp. 3d 319 (E.D. New York, 2016)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title III, §802, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 215; amended Pub. L. 99–508, title I, §101(c)(1)(A), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1851.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1986—Pub. L. 99–508 substituted "wire, oral, or electronic" for "wire or oral" in section catchline.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 99–508 effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 111 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 2510 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2513.