FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 110A

Interstate violation of protection order

18 U.S.C. § 2262
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter110A — DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND STALKING

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2262 (Interstate violation of protection order) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2262.

Text

(a)Offenses.—
(1)Travel or conduct of offender.—A person who travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or enters or leaves Indian country or is present within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, with the intent to engage in conduct that violates the portion of a protection order that prohibits or provides protection against violence, threats, or harassment against, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another person or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person, or that would violate such a portion of a protection order in the jurisdiction in which the order was issued, and subsequently engages in such conduct, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(2)Causing travel of victim.—A person wh

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. United States
526 U.S. 227 (Supreme Court, 1999)
2,183 case citations
United States v. Curley
639 F.3d 50 (Second Circuit, 2011)
75 case citations
United States v. David Yazzie Jones, Jr.
158 F.3d 492 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
70 case citations
Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure & Family Law Forms
810 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
57 case citations
United States v. Robinson
433 F.3d 31 (First Circuit, 2005)
51 case citations
United States v. Elisha Jacobs
244 F.3d 503 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
25 case citations
United States v. Brown
295 F.3d 152 (First Circuit, 2002)
15 case citations
United States v. Michael A. Casciano
124 F.3d 106 (Second Circuit, 1997)
6 case citations
United States v. Wright
965 F. Supp. 1307 (D. Nebraska, 1997)
4 case citations
Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms-Sexual Violence Forms
871 So. 2d 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
2 case citations
United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger
395 F.3d 1218 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
2 case citations
Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms—Domestic Violence Forms
830 So. 2d 72 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
1 case citations
United States v. Powell
62 F. App'x 543 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. John Glenn Bartley
711 F. App'x 127 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Harcrow v. Harcrow
(M.D. Tennessee, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40221(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1927; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, §1069(b)(2), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2656; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §605(d), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3509; Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title I, §1107(c), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1498; Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §117(b), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2989; Pub. L. 113–4, title I, §107(c), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 78; Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12502(a)(2), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4982.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2018—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 115–334, §12502(a)(2)(A)(i), inserted "or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person" after "another person".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 115–334, §12502(a)(2)(A)(ii), inserted "or the pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse of that person" after "proximity to, another person".
Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 115–334, §12502(a)(2)(B), inserted "including any case in which the offense is committed against a pet, service animal, emotional support animal, or horse," after "in any other case,".
2013—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–4, which directed amendment of subsec. (a)(2) by inserting "is present" after "Indian country or", was executed by making the insertion in subsec. (a)(1) to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–162 inserted "or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" after "Indian country".
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–386 added subsec. (a) and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (a). Text read as follows:
"(1) Crossing a state line.—A person who travels across a State line or enters or leaves Indian country with the intent to engage in conduct that—
"(A)(i) violates the portion of a protection order that involves protection against credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, or bodily injury to the person or persons for whom the protection order was issued; or
"(ii) would violate this subparagraph if the conduct occurred in the jurisdiction in which the order was issued; and
"(B) subsequently engages in such conduct,
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
"(2) Causing the crossing of a state line.—A person who causes a spouse or intimate partner to cross a State line or to enter or leave Indian country by force, coercion, duress, or fraud, and, in the course or as a result of that conduct, intentionally commits an act that injures the person's spouse or intimate partner in violation of a valid protection order issued by a State shall be punished as provided in subsection (b)."
1996—Subsec. (a)(1)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "violate this subparagraph" for "violate subparagraph (A)".
Subsec. (b)(1) to (3). Pub. L. 104–201 substituted "victim" for "offender's spouse or intimate partner".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 113–4 not effective until the beginning of the fiscal year following Mar. 7, 2013, see section 4 of Pub. L. 113–4, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2262.