FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 107
Stowaways on vessels or aircraft
18 U.S.C. § 2199
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter107 — SEAMEN AND STOWAWAYS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2199 (Stowaways on vessels or aircraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2199.
Text
Whoever, without the consent of the owner, charterer, master, or person in command of any vessel, or aircraft, with intent to obtain transportation, boards, enters or secretes himself aboard such vessel or aircraft and is thereon at the time of departure of said vessel or aircraft from a port, harbor, wharf, airport or other place within the jurisdiction of the United States; or
Whoever, with like intent, having boarded, entered or secreted himself aboard a vessel or aircraft at any place within or without the jurisdiction of the United States, remains aboard after the vessel or aircraft has left such place and is thereon at any place within the jurisdiction of the United States; or
Whoever, with intent to obtain a ride or transportation, boards or enters any aircraft owned or operated by
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Marvin Percival Johnson, Kathleen M. Johnson
713 F.2d 654 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Camacho-Ibarquen
404 F.3d 1283 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. McCulley
673 F.2d 346 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Robert M. Botts v. United States
413 F.2d 41 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc. v. The Batory Gdynia-America Shipping Lines, Limited v. Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc
215 F.2d 228 (Second Circuit, 1954)
De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy
208 F.2d 70 (Second Circuit, 1953)
United States v. Rodriguez
182 F. Supp. 479 (S.D. California, 1960)
United States v. Valdemar Da Silva Pereira
574 F.2d 103 (Second Circuit, 1978)
United States v. John Nassif
97 F.4th 968 (D.C. Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Angcog
190 F. Supp. 696 (D. Guam, 1961)
United States Ex Rel. Camezon v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization at Port of New York
105 F. Supp. 32 (S.D. New York, 1952)
United States v. Cordova
89 F. Supp. 298 (E.D. New York, 1950)
United States v. Banjoko
590 F.3d 1278 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Elvis Fredy Camacho-Ibarquen
410 F.3d 1307 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Ivencio-Belique-Emilia
65 F. App'x 788 (Third Circuit, 2003)
United v. Menere
145 F. Supp. 88 (S.D. New York, 1956)
United States Ex Rel. Lo Duca v. Neelly
213 F.2d 161 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Petrica Hamza
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Francisco Giyolen Buenaventura v. United States of America, Loncito Esperanza Suente v. United States
291 F.2d 86 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 802; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(8), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498; Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §308, Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 241.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§469–474 (June 11, 1940, ch. 326, §§1–3, 54 Stat. 306; Mar. 4, 1944, ch. 82, §§1–4, 58 Stat. 111; Apr. 10, 1944, ch. 162, 58 Stat. 188).
Sections consolidated and rewritten with changes of phraseology and substance.
In section 469 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the element of intent not to pay for transportation was omitted as unnecessary since the payment of transportation will invariably remove the stowaway from the operation of the section by purchasing the master's "consent".
In section 472 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the enumerations of State, Territory, Possession, District of Columbia, and The Canal Zone, was omitted as adequately covered by "place within the jurisdiction of the United States."
The punishment provision is the same as in sections 470, 472, and 473 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., but the fine is $500 more than the maximum fine provided by said section 469. There seemed no point, however, in preserving a differential in favor of the stowaway as against the aider and abettor of $500. The court can be trusted to exercise a wise discretion within the slightly larger limits provided by the revised section.
The provision for punishment of aiders and abettors in section 470 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was omitted as unnecessary since they are punishable as principals by section 2 of this title.
Sections 471 and 474 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as obviously unnecessary.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former fourth undesignated par. which read as follows: "Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in fourth undesignated par.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §303(b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 234, added item 2237.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§469–474 (June 11, 1940, ch. 326, §§1–3, 54 Stat. 306; Mar. 4, 1944, ch. 82, §§1–4, 58 Stat. 111; Apr. 10, 1944, ch. 162, 58 Stat. 188).
Sections consolidated and rewritten with changes of phraseology and substance.
In section 469 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the element of intent not to pay for transportation was omitted as unnecessary since the payment of transportation will invariably remove the stowaway from the operation of the section by purchasing the master's "consent".
In section 472 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the enumerations of State, Territory, Possession, District of Columbia, and The Canal Zone, was omitted as adequately covered by "place within the jurisdiction of the United States."
The punishment provision is the same as in sections 470, 472, and 473 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., but the fine is $500 more than the maximum fine provided by said section 469. There seemed no point, however, in preserving a differential in favor of the stowaway as against the aider and abettor of $500. The court can be trusted to exercise a wise discretion within the slightly larger limits provided by the revised section.
The provision for punishment of aiders and abettors in section 470 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was omitted as unnecessary since they are punishable as principals by section 2 of this title.
Sections 471 and 474 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as obviously unnecessary.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177 added pars. (1) to (3) and struck out former fourth undesignated par. which read as follows: "Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in fourth undesignated par.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §303(b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 234, added item 2237.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2199.