FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 83
Destruction of letter boxes or mail
18 U.S.C. § 1705
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter83 — POSTAL SERVICE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1705 (Destruction of letter boxes or mail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1705.
Text
Whoever willfully or maliciously injures, tears down or destroys any letter box or other receptacle intended or used for the receipt or delivery of mail on any mail route, or breaks open the same or willfully or maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any mail deposited therein, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Hempele
576 A.2d 793 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1990)
United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.
517 F.2d 953 (Second Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Raymond Boyd, Jr.
620 F.2d 129 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Paul H. "Bud" Holmes
822 F.2d 481 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Dominique Wallace v. United States
43 F.4th 595 (Sixth Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Ricky Mariano
729 F.3d 874 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Terry W. Holloway
991 F.2d 370 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Larry Dean Perry
815 F.2d 1100 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
Blevins v. Commonwealth
166 S.E.2d 325 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1969)
Durso v. SUMMER BROOK PRESERVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
641 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (M.D. Florida, 2008)
Drolsum v. Horne
691 A.2d 742 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
United States v. Raymond Berryhill, and Carolyn Denise Holley, A/K/A Linda Adams
466 F.2d 621 (Eighth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Kevin Williams
693 F.3d 1067 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Johnson v. Champions
990 F. Supp. 2d 1226 (S.D. Alabama, 2014)
United States v. Daniel Everette King
849 F.2d 1259 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. George Hills, Jr.
455 F.2d 504 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
People v. Weagley
218 Cal. App. 3d 569 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
United States v. Chairez
17 M.J. 787 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1983)
United States v. Shirley Darlene Sandy
421 F.2d 182 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
In re Chiquita Brands International, Inc. Alien Tort Statute & Shareholder Derivative Litigation
270 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Florida, 2017)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 779; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §38, 63 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3002(a)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §321 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §198, 35 Stat. 1126; May 18, 1916, ch. 126, §10, 39 Stat. 162; July 28, 1916, ch. 261, §1, 39 Stat. 418; May 7, 1934, ch. 220, §1, 48 Stat. 667).
Words "or shall willfully take or steal such mail from or out of such letter box or other receptacle" were omitted as covered by section 1702 of this title. Prosecutions for theft of mail matter are invariably made under that section whereas this section is used as basis for prosecutions for malicious mischief to mail boxes or receptacles. By Postal Regulations (1928), section 700, paragraph 2, an ordinary letter box is within this section and also section 1702 of this title. Huebner v. United States (C.C.A. 1928, 28 F. 2d 929).
Reference to persons assisting or aiding was omitted. Such persons are principals under definitive section 2 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
As amended by this section [section 38] of the bill, section 1705 of title 18, U.S.C., is brought more closely into conformity with the original statute from which it was derived by eliminating an inadvertent reference to a "conveyance" which was not in the original statute. (See S. Rept. No. 133, 81st Cong.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted ", or both" after "years".
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
1949—Act May 24, 1949, struck out reference to a "conveyance" which was not in original statute.
1948 Act
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §321 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §198, 35 Stat. 1126; May 18, 1916, ch. 126, §10, 39 Stat. 162; July 28, 1916, ch. 261, §1, 39 Stat. 418; May 7, 1934, ch. 220, §1, 48 Stat. 667).
Words "or shall willfully take or steal such mail from or out of such letter box or other receptacle" were omitted as covered by section 1702 of this title. Prosecutions for theft of mail matter are invariably made under that section whereas this section is used as basis for prosecutions for malicious mischief to mail boxes or receptacles. By Postal Regulations (1928), section 700, paragraph 2, an ordinary letter box is within this section and also section 1702 of this title. Huebner v. United States (C.C.A. 1928, 28 F. 2d 929).
Reference to persons assisting or aiding was omitted. Such persons are principals under definitive section 2 of this title.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
As amended by this section [section 38] of the bill, section 1705 of title 18, U.S.C., is brought more closely into conformity with the original statute from which it was derived by eliminating an inadvertent reference to a "conveyance" which was not in the original statute. (See S. Rept. No. 133, 81st Cong.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted ", or both" after "years".
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
1949—Act May 24, 1949, struck out reference to a "conveyance" which was not in original statute.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1705.