FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 9

Fee agreements in cases under title 11 and receiverships

18 U.S.C. § 155

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 155 (Fee agreements in cases under title 11 and receiverships) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 155.

Text

Whoever, being a party in interest, whether as a debtor, creditor, receiver, trustee or representative of any of them, or attorney for any such party in interest, in any receivership or case under title 11 in any United States court or under its supervision, knowingly and fraudulently enters into any agreement, express or implied, with another such party in interest or attorney for another such party in interest, for the purpose of fixing the fees or other compensation to be paid to any party in interest or to any attorney for any party in interest for services rendered in connection therewith, from the assets of the estate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Printing Dimensions, Inc.
153 B.R. 715 (D. Maryland, 1993)
30 case citations
Knapp v. Seligson
398 F.2d 607 (Second Circuit, 1968)
9 case citations
In Re Gianulias
111 B.R. 867 (E.D. California, 1989)
9 case citations
United States v. Shulman
466 F. Supp. 293 (S.D. New York, 1979)
7 case citations
In Re One City Centre Associates
111 B.R. 872 (E.D. California, 1990)
3 case citations
Mullendore v. Mullendore
527 F.2d 1031 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
2 case citations
Lutheran Hospitals & Homes Society v. Cracchiolo
422 F.2d 200 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
1 case citations
Stipe v. Mullendore
527 F.2d 1031 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
1 case citations
In re Hilmer
104 B.R. 174 (E.D. Missouri, 1989)
McLean v. Bondi
(Fifth Circuit, 2025)
In re Rodolitz Holding Corp.
187 B.R. 72 (E.D. New York, 1995)
Harris v. Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A. (In Re Harris)
458 B.R. 591 (N.D. Florida, 2011)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 690; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §4, 63 Stat. 90; Pub. L. 95–598, title III, §314(f)(1), (2), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2677; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

1948 Act
Based on section 572a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Aug. 25, 1937, ch. 777, 50 Stat. 810.)
Words "upon conviction" were deleted as surplusage since punishment can be imposed only after a conviction.
A fine of "$5,000" was substituted for "$10,000" and "one year" for "five years", to reduce the offense to the grade of a misdemeanor and the punishment to an amount and term proportionate to the gravity of the offense.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.

1949 Act
This amendment [see section 4] clarifies section 155 of title 18, U.S.C., by restating the first paragraph thereof in closer conformity with the original law, as it existed at the time of the enactment of the revision of title 18.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
1978—Pub. L. 95–598 substituted "cases under title 11 and receiverships" for "bankruptcy proceedings" in section catchline and in text "or case under title 11" for ", bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding", inserted "knowingly and fraudulently" after "supervision,", and struck out penalty provision for a judge of a United States court to knowingly approve the payment of any fees or compensation that were fixed.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, inserted references to attorneys for any party in interest in three places, and substituted "in any United States court or under its supervision" for "in or under the supervision of any court of the United States".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

Savings Provision
Amendment by section 314 of Pub. L. 95–598 not to affect the application of chapter 9 (§151 et seq.), chapter 96 (§1961 et seq.), or section 2516, 3057, or 3284 of this title to any act of any person (1) committed before Oct. 1, 1979, or (2) committed after Oct. 1, 1979, in connection with a case commenced before such date, see section 403(d) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as a note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/155.