FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 73
Obstruction of State or local law enforcement
18 U.S.C. § 1511
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter73 — OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1511 (Obstruction of State or local law enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1511.
Text
(a)It shall be unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to obstruct the enforcement of the criminal laws of a State or political subdivision thereof, with the intent to facilitate an illegal gambling business if—
(1)one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of such a conspiracy;
(2)one or more of such persons is an official or employee, elected, appointed, or otherwise, of such State or political subdivision; and
(3)one or more of such persons conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an illegal gambling business.
(b)As used in this section—
(1)"illegal gambling business" means a gambling business which—
(i)is a violation of the law of a State or political subdivision in which it is conducted;
(ii)involves five or more persons
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Iannelli v. United States
420 U.S. 770 (Supreme Court, 1975)
United States v. Richard D. Enright
579 F.2d 980 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Philip A. Chance
306 F.3d 356 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Lonnie M. Brown, Robert L. Newsome, James B. Finney, Julian E. Seymour, Jr., and Benjamin Clyde Cranford, Jr.
555 F.2d 407 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Richard Becker and Jack Eisen
461 F.2d 230 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. David S. O'Bryant
998 F.2d 21 (First Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Bazzano
712 F.2d 826 (Third Circuit, 1983)
United States v. James Bernard Singleton
460 F.2d 1148 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Michael A. Riehl, Appeal of Arthur J. Rinaldi. Appeal of James L. Chick
460 F.2d 454 (Third Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Phillip Wayne Bridges
493 F.2d 918 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Thomas Anthony Ceraso, in No. 72-1279 Appeal of Beverly Ceraso, in 72-1280. Appeal of John E. Troutman, in 72-1284
467 F.2d 653 (Third Circuit, 1972)
In the Matter of Disclosure of Testimony Before the Grand Jury. Appeal of Anthony S. Troia
580 F.2d 281 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Robert G. Altomare
625 F.2d 5 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. James Orris Nettles and Emory Robinson, Jr.
570 F.2d 547 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Anthony Joseph Acon
513 F.2d 513 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Pugin v. Garland
599 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 2023)
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero and John Cerasani
754 F.2d 927 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Medford
661 F.3d 746 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Dennis George, United States of America v. Donald Eugene Honeycutt, United States of America v. James W. Barr
568 F.2d 1064 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Bally Manufacturing Corporation
345 F. Supp. 410 (E.D. Louisiana, 1972)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §802(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936; amended Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(2)(C), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to section 501(c)(3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fine under this title" for "fine of not more than $20,000".
1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Congressional Statement of Findings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §801, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936, provided that: "The Congress finds that illegal gambling involves widespread use of, and has an effect upon, interstate commerce and the facilities thereof."
Priority of State Laws
Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §811, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 940, provided that: "No provision of this title [enacting this section and section 1955 of this title, amending section 2516 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section 1955 of this title] indicates an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision operates to the exclusion of the law of a state or possession, or a political subdivision of a State or possession, on the same subject matter, or to relieve any person of any obligation imposed by any law of any State or possession, or political subdivision of a State or possession."
References in Text
Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to section 501(c)(3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fine under this title" for "fine of not more than $20,000".
1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Congressional Statement of Findings
Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §801, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936, provided that: "The Congress finds that illegal gambling involves widespread use of, and has an effect upon, interstate commerce and the facilities thereof."
Priority of State Laws
Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §811, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 940, provided that: "No provision of this title [enacting this section and section 1955 of this title, amending section 2516 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section 1955 of this title] indicates an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision operates to the exclusion of the law of a state or possession, or a political subdivision of a State or possession, on the same subject matter, or to relieve any person of any obligation imposed by any law of any State or possession, or political subdivision of a State or possession."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1511.