FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 12

Civil remedies

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 17Copyrights·Ch. 12 — COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
(a)Civil Actions.—Any person injured by a violation of section 1201 or 1202 may bring a civil action in an appropriate United States district court for such violation.
(b)Powers of the Court.—In an action brought under subsection (a), the court—
(1)may grant temporary and permanent injunctions on such terms as it deems reasonable to prevent or restrain a violation, but in no event shall impose a prior restraint on free speech or the press protected under the 1st amendment to the Constitution;
(2)at any time while an action is pending, may order the impounding, on such terms as it deems reasonable, of any device or product that is in the custody or control of the alleged violator and that the court has reasonable cause to believe was involved in a violation;
(3)may award damages under

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

17 U.S.C. § 1203 (Civil remedies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.
815 F.3d 1145 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
59 case citations
Agence France Presse v. Morel
293 F.R.D. 682 (S.D. New York, 2013)
31 case citations
Goldman v. Healthcare Management Systems, Inc.
559 F. Supp. 2d 853 (W.D. Michigan, 2008)
29 case citations
Energy Intelligence Grp, Inc. v. Kayne Ande
948 F.3d 261 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
28 case citations
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co.
843 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
12 case citations
Microsoft Corp. v. EEE Business Inc.
555 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (N.D. California, 2008)
3 case citations
Bungie Inc v. Veterancheats.com
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Bungie Inc v. Bansal
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Technopark Co.
281 F.R.D. 683 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Green v. U.S. Department of Justice
(District of Columbia, 2019)
Sadowski v. Shivley
(D. Oregon, 2019)
Viral DRM LLC v. Lietucheva
(N.D. California, 2024)
Viral DRM, LLC v. Shubstorsky
(N.D. California, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title I, §103(a), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title V, §5004(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–593; Pub. L. 111–295, §6(f)(3), Dec. 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 3181.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2010—Subsec. (c)(5)(B)(i). Pub. L. 111–295 substituted "118(f)" for "118(g)".
1999—Subsec. (c)(5)(B). Pub. L. 106–113 amended heading and text of subpar. (B) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In the case of a nonprofit library, archives, or educational institution, the court shall remit damages in any case in which the library, archives, or educational institution sustains the burden of proving, and the court finds, that the library, archives, or educational institution was not aware and had no reason to believe that its acts constituted a violation."