FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Scope of exclusive rights in architectural works

17 U.S.C. § 120
Title17Copyrights
Chapter1 — SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT

This text of 17 U.S.C. § 120 (Scope of exclusive rights in architectural works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
17 U.S.C. § 120.

Text

(a)Pictorial Representations Permitted.—The copyright in an architectural work that has been constructed does not include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building in which the work is embodied is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place.
(b)Alterations to and Destruction of Buildings.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106(2), the owners of a building embodying an architectural work may, without the consent of the author or copyright owner of the architectural work, make or authorize the making of alterations to such building, and destroy or authorize the destruction of such building.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. Haver
171 F.3d 943 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
91 case citations
T-Peg, Inc. v. Vermont Timber Works, Inc.
459 F.3d 97 (First Circuit, 2006)
70 case citations
Gaylord v. United States
595 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
29 case citations
Imapizza, LLC v. At Pizza Ltd.
334 F. Supp. 3d 95 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
25 case citations
Leicester v. Warner Bros.
232 F.3d 1212 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
13 case citations
Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Kipp Flores Architects, LLC
602 F. App'x 985 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
11 case citations
Imapizza, LLC v. At Pizza Limited
965 F.3d 871 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
11 case citations
Designworks Homes, Inc. v. Columbia Hse of Brokers Realty
9 F.4th 803 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
11 case citations
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys
76 F.4th 1116 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
10 case citations
Landrau v. Solis Betancourt
554 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D. Puerto Rico, 2007)
8 case citations
Gaylord v. United States
85 Fed. Cl. 59 (Federal Claims, 2008)
6 case citations
Guillot-Vogt Associates, Inc. v. Holly & Smith
848 F. Supp. 682 (E.D. Louisiana, 1994)
5 case citations
Tiffany Design, Inc. v. Reno-Tahoe Specialty, Inc.
55 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Nevada, 1999)
3 case citations
Builders Mutual Insurance v. Donald A. Gardner Architects, Inc.
856 F. Supp. 2d 773 (D. South Carolina, 2012)
2 case citations
No. 98-1934
171 F.3d 943 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
RMS Titanic v. Haver
(Fourth Circuit, 1999)
Imapizza, LLC v. at Pizza Limited
(District of Columbia, 2021)
Davidson v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2017)
Mercedes Benz USA LLC v. Soto
(E.D. Michigan, 2019)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title VII, §704(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5133.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section applicable to any architectural work created on or after Dec. 1, 1990, and any architectural work, that, on Dec. 1, 1990, is unconstructed and embodied in unpublished plans or drawings, except that protection for such architectural work under this title terminates on Dec. 31, 2002, unless the work is constructed by that date, see section 706 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 U.S.C. § 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/17/120.