FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programs

17 U.S.C. § 117
Title17Copyrights
Chapter1 — SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE OF COPYRIGHT

This text of 17 U.S.C. § 117 (Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
17 U.S.C. § 117.

Text

(a)Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
(1)that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or
(2)that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.
(b)Lease, Sale, or Other Transfer of Additional Copy or Adaptation.—Any exact copies prepared in accordance with the provisions of t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
387 F.3d 522 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
147 case citations
Facenda v. N.F.L. Films, Inc.
542 F.3d 1007 (Third Circuit, 2008)
113 case citations
Wall Data Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
447 F.3d 769 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
83 case citations
Vault Corporation v. Quaid Software Limited
847 F.2d 255 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
73 case citations
Asset Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Gagnon
542 F.3d 748 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
64 case citations
Universal Instruments Corp. v. Micro Sys. Eng'g, Inc.
924 F.3d 32 (Second Circuit, 2019)
64 case citations
Arthur Young & Company v. City of Richmond
895 F.2d 967 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
36 case citations
Itofca, Inc. v. Megatrans Logistics, Inc.
322 F.3d 928 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
34 case citations
Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.
797 F.2d 1222 (Third Circuit, 1986)
27 case citations
Krause v. Titleserv, Inc.
402 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2005)
26 case citations
Dsc Communications Corporation v. Pulse Communications, Inc., Defendant-Cross
170 F.3d 1354 (Federal Circuit, 1999)
22 case citations
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International, Inc.
562 F. Supp. 775 (C.D. California, 1983)
16 case citations
National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
552 F. Supp. 89 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
16 case citations
Secure Services Technology, Inc. v. Time & Space Processing, Inc.
722 F. Supp. 1354 (E.D. Virginia, 1989)
16 case citations
Micro-Sparc, Inc. v. Amtype Corp.
592 F. Supp. 33 (D. Massachusetts, 1984)
13 case citations
Foresight Resources Corp. v. Pfortmiller
719 F. Supp. 1006 (D. Kansas, 1989)
11 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2565; Pub. L. 96–517, §10(b), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3028; Pub. L. 105–304, title III, §302, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2887.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

house report no. 94–1476
As the program for general revision of the copyright law has evolved, it has become increasingly apparent that in one major area the problems are not sufficiently developed for a definitive legislative solution. This is the area of computer uses of copyrighted works: the use of a work "in conjunction with automatic systems capable of storing, processing, retrieving, or transferring information." The Commission on New Technological Uses is, among other things, now engaged in making a thorough study of the emerging patterns in this field and it will, on the basis of its findings, recommend definitive copyright provisions to deal with the situation.
Since it would be premature to change existing law on computer uses at present, the purpose of section 117 is to preserve the status quo. It is intended neither to cut off any rights that may now exist, nor to create new rights that might be denied under the Act of 1909 or under common law principles currently applicable.
The provision deals only with the exclusive rights of a copyright owner with respect to computer uses, that is, the bundle of rights specified for other types of uses in section 106 and qualified in sections 107 through 116 and 118. With respect to the copyright-ability of computer programs, the ownership of copyrights in them, the term of protection, and the formal requirements of the remainder of the bill, the new statute would apply.
Under section 117, an action for infringement of a copyrighted work by means of a computer would necessarily be a federal action brought under the new title 17. The court, in deciding the scope of exclusive rights in the computer area, would first need to determine the applicable law, whether State statutory or common law or the Act of 1909. Having determined what law was applicable, its decision would depend upon its interpretation of what that law was on the point on the day before the effective date of the new statute.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1998—Pub. L. 105–304 designated existing provisions as subsecs. (a) and (b), inserted headings, and added subsecs. (c) and (d).
1980—Pub. L. 96–517 substituted provision respecting limitations on exclusive rights in connection with computer programs for prior provision enunciating scope of exclusive rights and use of the work in conjunction with computers and similar information systems and declaring owner of copyright in a work without any greater or lesser rights with respect to the use of the work in conjunction with automatic systems capable of storing, processing, retrieving, or transferring information, or in conjunction with any similar device, machine, or process, than those afforded to works under the law, whether this title or the common law or statutes of a State, in effect on Dec. 31, 1977, as held applicable and construed by the court in an action brought under this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 U.S.C. § 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/17/117.