FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VI—SEQUOIA AND YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARKS
Yosemite, Sequoia, and General Grant National Parks; exclusive jurisdiction of United States; jurisdiction remaining in and taxation by California
16 U.S.C. § 57
Title16 — Conservation
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VI—SEQUOIA AND YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARKS
This text of 16 U.S.C. § 57 (Yosemite, Sequoia, and General Grant National Parks; exclusive jurisdiction of United States; jurisdiction remaining in and taxation by California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 57.
Text
Sole and exclusive jurisdiction is assumed by the United States over the territory embraced and included within the Yosemite National Park, Sequoia National Park, and General Grant National Park, respectively, saving, however, to the State of California the right to serve civil or criminal process within the limits of the aforesaid parks or either of them in suits or prosecutions for or on account of rights acquired, obligations incurred, or crimes committed in said State outside of said parks; and saving further to the said State the right to tax persons and corporations, their franchises and property on the lands included in said parks, and the right to fix and collect license fees for fishing in said parks; and saving also to the persons residing in any of said parks now or hereafter th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.
304 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Coso Energy Developers v. County of Inyo
19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 669 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)
Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Collins
20 F. Supp. 1009 (N.D. California, 1937)
Yellow Cab Transit Co. v. Johnson
48 F. Supp. 594 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1942)
Muchhala v. United States
532 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (E.D. California, 2007)
Hugger v. Aramark Campus LLC
(E.D. California, 2024)
Vega v. DNC Parks & Resorts at Asilomar, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2019)
Williams v. Aramark Campus LLC
(E.D. California, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §1, 41 Stat. 731.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
A provision accepting the act of the California Legislature which ceded to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over the territory referred to in this section has been omitted as executed.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
General Grant National Park Abolished
Act Mar. 4, 1940, ch. 40, §2, 54 Stat. 43, set out as section 80a of this title, abolished the General Grant National Park and added the lands to the Kings Canyon National Park as the General Grant grove section.
Codification
A provision accepting the act of the California Legislature which ceded to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over the territory referred to in this section has been omitted as executed.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
General Grant National Park Abolished
Act Mar. 4, 1940, ch. 40, §2, 54 Stat. 43, set out as section 80a of this title, abolished the General Grant National Park and added the lands to the Kings Canyon National Park as the General Grant grove section.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/57.