FEDERAL · 16 U.S.C. · Chapter 33

Congressional declaration of policy

16 U.S.C. § 1452
Title16Conservation
Chapter33 — COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT

This text of 16 U.S.C. § 1452 (Congressional declaration of policy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
16 U.S.C. § 1452.

Text

The Congress finds and declares that it is the national policy—

(1)to preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, to restore or enhance, the resources of the Nation's coastal zone for this and succeeding generations;
(2)to encourage and assist the states to exercise effectively their responsibilities in the coastal zone through the development and implementation of management programs to achieve wise use of the land and water resources of the coastal zone, giving full consideration to ecological, cultural, historic, and esthetic values as well as the needs for compatible economic development, which programs should at least provide for—
(A)the protection of natural resources, including wetlands, flood plains, estuaries, beaches, dunes, barrier islands, coral reefs, and fish and wildl

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
483 U.S. 825 (Supreme Court, 1987)
1,291 case citations
Secretary of the Interior v. California
464 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1984)
177 case citations
Cape May Greene, Inc. v. Warren
698 F.2d 179 (Third Circuit, 1983)
105 case citations
Orion Corporation v. State
693 P.2d 1369 (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)
102 case citations
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly
822 F.2d 388 (Third Circuit, 1987)
51 case citations
United States v. Holland
373 F. Supp. 665 (M.D. Florida, 1974)
51 case citations
Amber Resources Co. v. United States
538 F.3d 1358 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
47 case citations
California v. Watt
683 F.2d 1253 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
44 case citations
Friends of the Earth v. United States Navy
841 F.2d 927 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
28 case citations
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Oberly
632 F. Supp. 1225 (D. Delaware, 1986)
19 case citations
The State of California, Acting by and Through Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., the California Coastal Commission, the California Air Resources Board, the California Resources Agency, the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Department of Conservation v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior the United States Department of the Interior Edward Hastey, as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management Robert Burford, as Director Designate of the United States Bureau of Land Management, in His Official Capacity as Director When and if Assumed the United States Bureau of Land Management, Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association Amoco Production Company, a Corporation Atlantic Richfield Company, a Corporation Champlin Refining Company, a Corporation Chevron U. S. A. Inc. Cities Service Company, a Corporation Conoco, Inc. Elf Acquitaine Oil and Gas, a Corporation Exxon Corporation Getty Oil Company, a Corporation Gulf Oil Corporation Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation and Shell Oil Company, a Corporation, Defendants-In-Intervention/appellants. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. The Sierra Club Friends of the Earth Friends of the Sea Otter and the Environmental Coalition on Lease Sale 53 v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association, Etc., Defendants-In-Intervention/appellants. State of California, Acting by and Through Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Etc., County of Humboldt County of Marin County of Mendocino County of Monterey County of San Luis Obispo County of San Mateo County of Santa Barbara County of Santa Clara County of Santa Cruz County of Sonoma City and County of San Francisco City of Brisbane City of Capitola City of Carmel-By-The-Sea City of Los Angeles City of Morro Bay City of Pismo Beach City of San Luis Obispo City of Santa Barbara City of Santa Cruz City of Santa Monica City of Seaside Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, Plaintiffs-In-Intervention/appellees v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Etc., County of San Diego, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellant v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association, Etc., Defendants-In-Intervention/appellees. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Etc. v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., State of California, Acting by and Through Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Etc., County of San Diego, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellant v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association, Etc., Defendants-In-Intervention/appellees. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Etc., County of Humboldt, Etc., Plaintiffs-In-Intervention/appellants v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association, Etc., Defendants-In-Intervention/appellees. The State of California, Acting by and Through Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Etc., County of Humboldt, Etc., Plaintiffs-In-Intervention v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc., Western Oil and Gas Association, a Regional Trade Association, Etc., Defendants-In-Intervention/appellees. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Etc., County of Humboldt, Etc., Plaintiffs-In-Intervention/appellees v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior Etc., the State of California, Acting by and Through Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Etc., County of Humboldt, Etc., Plaintiffs-In-Intervention/appellants v. James G. Watt, as Secretary of the Interior, Etc.
683 F.2d 1253 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
19 case citations
American Petroleum Institute v. Robert W. Knecht
609 F.2d 1306 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
18 case citations
State of NY v. DeLyser
759 F. Supp. 982 (W.D. New York, 1991)
14 case citations
Conservation Law Foundation v. Watt
560 F. Supp. 561 (D. Massachusetts, 1983)
11 case citations
Plaquemines Parish v. Riverwood Production Co., In
969 F.3d 502 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
11 case citations
Defend H20 v. Town Board of East Hampton
147 F. Supp. 3d 80 (E.D. New York, 2015)
9 case citations
Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Narragansett Electric Co.
878 F. Supp. 349 (D. Rhode Island, 1995)
8 case citations
Acme Fill Corp. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission
187 Cal. App. 3d 1056 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
8 case citations
City of Sausalito v. O'NEILL
211 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (N.D. California, 2002)
7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 89–454, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 92–583, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1281; amended Pub. L. 96–464, §3, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2060; Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6203(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–301; Pub. L. 102–587, title II, §2205(b)(2), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5050.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1992—Par. (2). Pub. L. 102–587 made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(1). See 1990 Amendment note below.
1990—Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(1), as amended by Pub. L. 102–587, substituted "as well as the needs for compatible" for "as well as to needs for".
Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(2), substituted "likely to be affected by or vulnerable to sea level rise, land subsidence," for "of subsidence".
Par. (2)(C) to (J). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(3), redesignated subpars. (C) to (I) as (D) to (J), respectively, and added subpar. (C).
Par. (2)(K). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(4), added subpar. (K).
Par. (3). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(5), inserted "including those areas likely to be affected by land subsidence, sea level rise, or fluctuating water levels of the Great Lakes," after "hazardous areas,".
Pars. (5), (6). Pub. L. 101–508, §6203(b)(6), added pars. (5) and (6).
1980—Pub. L. 96–464, in amending section generally, expanded declaration of policy to provide for higher level of protection for significant natural coastal resources and inserted provisions for special area management planning to increase predictability for necessary coastal-dependent economic growth, improve hazard mitigation, and improve predictability in government decisionmaking.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 U.S.C. § 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/16/1452.