FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 2A
Directions and waivers by bondholders; prohibition of impairment of holder's right to payment; record date
15 U.S.C. § 77ppp
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter2A — SECURITIES AND TRUST INDENTURES
SubchapterIII
Current throughPub. L. 119-99
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 77ppp (Directions and waivers by bondholders; prohibition of impairment of holder's right to payment; record date) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 77ppp.
Text
(a)Directions and waivers by bondholders
The indenture to be qualified—
(1)shall automatically be deemed (unless it is expressly provided therein that any such provision is excluded) to contain provisions authorizing the holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the indenture securities or if expressly specified in such indenture, of any series of securities at the time outstanding (A) to direct the time, method, and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to such trustee, or exercising any trust or power conferred upon such trustee, under such indenture, or (B) on behalf of the holders of all such indenture securities, to consent to the waiver of any past default and its consequences; or
(2)may contain provisions authorizing the holders of not less
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of New York v. First Millennium, Inc.
607 F.3d 905 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad
492 F.3d 986 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Quadrant Structured Products Co. v. Vertin
16 N.E.3d 1165 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Marblegate Asset Management, LLC v. Education Management Finance Corp.
846 F.3d 1 (Second Circuit, 2017)
Brady v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
538 F.3d 1319 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. Education Loan Trust IV
87 A.3d 632 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2014)
McMahan & Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.
65 F.3d 1044 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Upic & Co. v. Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc.
793 F. Supp. 448 (S.D. New York, 1992)
CIBC Bank & Trust Co. v. Banco Central Do Brasil
886 F. Supp. 1105 (S.D. New York, 1995)
McMahan & Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.
859 F. Supp. 743 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Envirodyne Industries, Inc. v. Connecticut Mutual Life Co. (In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.)
174 B.R. 986 (N.D. Illinois, 1994)
In Re Board of Directors of Multicanal S.A.
307 B.R. 384 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. James River Corp.
716 So. 2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)
Marblegate Asset Management v. Education Management Corp.
75 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund v. Bank of New York Mellon
914 F. Supp. 2d 422 (S.D. New York, 2012)
In re Residential Capital, LLC
497 B.R. 720 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Tandy Corporation v. United States
626 F.2d 1186 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Quadrant Structured Products Co. v. Vertin
106 A.3d 992 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2013)
Meehancombs Global Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP v. Caesars Entertainment Corp.
162 F. Supp. 3d 200 (S.D. New York, 2015)
In Re Delta Air Lines, Inc.
370 B.R. 537 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Source Credit
History
(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title III, §316, as added Aug. 3, 1939, ch. 411, 53 Stat. 1172; amended Pub. L. 101–550, title IV, §415, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2731; Pub. L. 117–103, div. U, §108, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 832.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–103 substituted "such holder, except—" for "such holder, except", designated remainder of existing provisions as pars. (1) and (2), and added par. (3).
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(1)–(3), in introductory provisions struck out "may contain provisions" after "qualified", in par. (1) inserted "shall automatically be deemed (unless it is expressly provided therein that any such provision is excluded) to contain provisions" before "authorizing the holders" and "or if expressly specified in such indenture, of any series of securities" after "principal amount of the indenture securities", and in par. (2) inserted "may contain provisions" before "authorizing the holders" and "or if expressly specified in such indenture, of any series of securities" after "principal amount of the indenture securities".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(5), which directed the substitution of "of the indenture to be qualified" for "thereof", was executed by making the substitution for "thereof" the first time appearing, as the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(6), added subsec. (c).
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–103 substituted "such holder, except—" for "such holder, except", designated remainder of existing provisions as pars. (1) and (2), and added par. (3).
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(1)–(3), in introductory provisions struck out "may contain provisions" after "qualified", in par. (1) inserted "shall automatically be deemed (unless it is expressly provided therein that any such provision is excluded) to contain provisions" before "authorizing the holders" and "or if expressly specified in such indenture, of any series of securities" after "principal amount of the indenture securities", and in par. (2) inserted "may contain provisions" before "authorizing the holders" and "or if expressly specified in such indenture, of any series of securities" after "principal amount of the indenture securities".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(5), which directed the substitution of "of the indenture to be qualified" for "thereof", was executed by making the substitution for "thereof" the first time appearing, as the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–550, §415(6), added subsec. (c).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 77ppp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/77ppp.