FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—DOMESTIC SECURITIES
Court review of orders
15 U.S.C. § 77i
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—DOMESTIC SECURITIES
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 77i (Court review of orders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 77i.
Text
(a)Any person aggrieved by an order of the Commission may obtain a review of such order in the court of appeals of the United States, within any circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such Court, within sixty days after the entry of such order, a written petition praying that the order of the Commission be modified or be set aside in whole or in part. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith transmitted by the clerk of the court to the Commission, and thereupon the Commission shall file in the court the record upon which the order complained of was entered, as provided in section 2112 of title 28. No objection to the order of the Commission shall be considered by the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barlow v. Collins
397 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel
921 F.2d 1465 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
Steadman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
450 U.S. 91 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Republic Bank & Trust Company v. Bear Stearns & Company., Inc.
683 F.3d 239 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Payne v. Salazar
619 F.3d 56 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
627 F.2d 1151 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Minnie Florence Breeden v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary Health, Education, and Welfare
493 F.2d 1002 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
John A. Healey, Michael S. Press v. Chelsea Resources, Ltd., Dominick & Dominick Securities, Inc. And Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated
947 F.2d 611 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Ashland, Inc. v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
648 F.3d 461 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
Capri v. Murphy
856 F.2d 473 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Gilbert v. Nixon
429 F.2d 348 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Bove v. Shinseki
25 Vet. App. 136 (Veterans Claims, 2011)
Baker, Watts & Company v. Miles & Stockbridge Timothy R. Casgar, Baker, Watts & Company v. Miles & Stockbridge Timothy R. Casgar
876 F.2d 1101 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
DeAngelis v. Corzine
982 F. Supp. 2d 277 (S.D. New York, 2013)
C.E. CARLSON, INC. and Charles E. Carlson, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
859 F.2d 1429 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Kenneth J. Wilson v. Ruffa & Hanover, P.C.
844 F.2d 81 (Second Circuit, 1988)
EDWARD J. MAWOD & COMPANY and Edward J. Mawod, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
591 F.2d 588 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Folger Adam Company v. Pmi Industries, Inc., Control Systems Corporation, Wedge Group, Inc., and Salomon Brothers Inc.
938 F.2d 1529 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp.
601 F.2d 557 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1979)
Source Credit
History
(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §9, 48 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 85–791, §9, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 945; Pub. L. 100–181, title II, §206, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1252.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–181 substituted "court of appeals" for "Circuit Court of Appeals", "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such Court" for "Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, by filing in such court", and "section 1254 of title 28" for "sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (U.S.C., title 28, secs. 346 and 347)".
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–791, in second sentence, substituted "transmitted by the clerk of the court to" for "served upon", struck out "certify and" before "file in the court", struck out "a transcript of" after "file in the court", and inserted "as provided in section 2112 of title 28".
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–181 substituted "court of appeals" for "Circuit Court of Appeals", "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, by filing in such Court" for "Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, by filing in such court", and "section 1254 of title 28" for "sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended (U.S.C., title 28, secs. 346 and 347)".
1958—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–791, in second sentence, substituted "transmitted by the clerk of the court to" for "served upon", struck out "certify and" before "file in the court", struck out "a transcript of" after "file in the court", and inserted "as provided in section 2112 of title 28".
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 77i, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/77i.