FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
Insider trades during pension fund blackout periods
15 U.S.C. § 7244
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 7244 (Insider trades during pension fund blackout periods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 7244.
Text
(a)Prohibition of insider trading during pension fund blackout periods
Except to the extent otherwise provided by rule of the Commission pursuant to paragraph (3), it shall be unlawful for any director or executive officer of an issuer of any equity security (other than an exempted security), directly or indirectly, to purchase, sell, or otherwise acquire or transfer any equity security of the issuer (other than an exempted security) during any blackout period with respect to such equity security if such director or officer acquires such equity security in connection with his or her service or employment as a director or executive officer.
Any profit realized by a director or executive officer referred to in paragraph (1) from any purchase, sale, or other acquisition or transfer in violat
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litigation
549 F.3d 1223 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Ruotolo v. Fannie Mae
933 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Cohen v. Viray Ex Rel. DHB Industries, Inc.
622 F.3d 188 (Second Circuit, 2010)
In Re BISYS Group Inc. Derivative Action
396 F. Supp. 2d 463 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Diaz v. Davis
549 F.3d 1223 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Neer v. Pelino
389 F. Supp. 2d 648 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
468 F. Supp. 2d 670 (D. New Jersey, 2006)
Kogan Ex Rel. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Robinson
432 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (S.D. California, 2006)
In Re iBasis, Inc. Derivative Litigation
532 F. Supp. 2d 214 (D. Massachusetts, 2007)
Navistar International Corp. v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
837 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Illinois, 2011)
Ness v. Samson Resources
(D. North Dakota, 2019)
In re: DHB Industries, Inc. Derivative Litigation
(Second Circuit, 2010)
Kaul v. Intercontinental Exchange
(S.D. New York, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 107–204, title III, §306, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 779.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
For amendments made by this subsection and this section, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (c), see Codification note below.
Codification
Section is comprised of section 306 of Pub. L. 107–204. Subsec. (b)(1) of section 306 of Pub. L. 107–204 amended section 1021 of Title 29, Labor, and another par. (3) of subsec. (b) amended section 1132 of Title 29.
References in Text
For amendments made by this subsection and this section, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (c), see Codification note below.
Codification
Section is comprised of section 306 of Pub. L. 107–204. Subsec. (b)(1) of section 306 of Pub. L. 107–204 amended section 1021 of Title 29, Labor, and another par. (3) of subsec. (b) amended section 1132 of Title 29.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 7244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/7244.