FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 15B
Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties
15 U.S.C. § 717u
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter15B — NATURAL GAS
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 717u (Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 717u.
Text
The District Courts of the United States and the United States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of this chapter or the rules, regulations, and orders thereunder, and of all suits in equity and actions at law brought to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder. Any criminal proceeding shall be brought in the district wherein any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred. Any suit or action to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder may be brought in any such district or in the district wherein the d
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tafflin v. Levitt
493 U.S. 455 (Supreme Court, 1990)
California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.
375 F.3d 831 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Del. for New Castle Cty.
366 U.S. 656 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning
578 U.S. 374 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. an Exclusive Gas Storage Leasehold & Easement in the Cloverly Subterranean Geological Formation
524 F.3d 1090 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing Authority
1994 OK 20 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1994)
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
767 F.3d 335 (Third Circuit, 2014)
Total Gas & Power North America, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
859 F.3d 325 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Clark v. Gulf Oil Corp.
570 F.2d 1138 (Third Circuit, 1977)
Stand Energy Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
373 F. Supp. 2d 631 (S.D. West Virginia, 2005)
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Kanwal Singh
707 F.3d 583 (Sixth Circuit, 2013)
Eastern Shore Natural Gas Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
298 A.2d 322 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1972)
Raton Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
891 F.2d 323 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Burke
768 F. Supp. 1167 (N.D. West Virginia, 1990)
Southern Union Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Oil and Gas, Inc., Intervenor
857 F.2d 812 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
567 F.3d 134 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Farmland Industries, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellant
486 F.2d 315 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
In Re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Anti.
346 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Nevada, 2004)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Utilicorp United Inc.
928 F. Supp. 466 (D. Delaware, 1996)
Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota, LLC
103 F. Supp. 3d 1000 (D. Minnesota, 2015)
Source Credit
History
(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §24, formerly §22, 52 Stat. 833; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 875, 895; renumbered §24, Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §314(b)(1)(A), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 690.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
The words "the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia" following "The District Courts of the United States" omitted as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district" and section 88 of title 28 which states that "The District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".
"Sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28" substituted in text for "sections 128 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended [28 U.S.C. 225 and 347]" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, the first section of which enacted Title 28.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 24 of act June 21, 1938, was renumbered section 26 and is classified to section 717w of this title.
Codification
The words "the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia" following "The District Courts of the United States" omitted as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district" and section 88 of title 28 which states that "The District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".
"Sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28" substituted in text for "sections 128 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended [28 U.S.C. 225 and 347]" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, the first section of which enacted Title 28.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 24 of act June 21, 1938, was renumbered section 26 and is classified to section 717w of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 717u, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/717u.