FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 2
Export trade and antitrust legislation
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 15 — Commerce and Trade·Ch. 2 — FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION; PROMOTION OF EXPORT TRADE AND PREVENTION OF UNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION·Subch. II
Nothing contained in the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] shall be construed as declaring to be illegal an association entered into for the sole purpose of engaging in export trade and actually engaged solely in such export trade, or an agreement made or act done in the course of export trade by such association, provided such association, agreement, or act is not in restraint of trade within the United States, and is not in restraint of the export trade of any domestic competitor of such association: Provided, That such association does not, either in the United States or elsewhere, enter into any agreement, understanding, or conspiracy, or do any act which artificially or intentionally enhances or depresses prices within the United States of commodities of the class exported by such ass
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 U.S.C. § 62 (Export trade and antitrust legislation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
351 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1956)
United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
374 U.S. 321 (Supreme Court, 1963)
United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
393 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
434 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1978)
American Federation of Musicians v. Carroll
391 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1968)
United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
461 F. Supp. 1314 (District of Columbia, 1978)
Helicopter Support Systems, Inc. v. Hughes Helicopter, Inc.
818 F.2d 1530 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
551 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 2007)
In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
261 F. Supp. 3d 430 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Marnell v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
260 F. Supp. 391 (N.D. California, 1966)
United States v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
92 F. Supp. 947 (D. Massachusetts, 1950)
Chemi SpA v. GlaxoSmithKline
356 F. Supp. 2d 495 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)
Latin America/pacific Coast Steamship Conference and Its Member Lines v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
465 F.2d 542 (D.C. Circuit, 1972)
United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n
86 F. Supp. 59 (S.D. New York, 1949)
United States v. Safehouse
985 F.3d 225 (Third Circuit, 2021)
Horizons International, Inc. v. Baldrige
811 F.2d 154 (Third Circuit, 1987)
United States v. National Association of Broadcasters
536 F. Supp. 149 (District of Columbia, 1982)
International Raw Materials, Ltd. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
716 F. Supp. 188 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)
United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass'n
273 F. Supp. 263 (S.D. New York, 1967)
International Raw Materials, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
767 F. Supp. 687 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Source Credit
History
(Apr. 10, 1918, ch. 50, §2, 40 Stat. 517.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
"Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.]" substituted in text for "Act entitled 'An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies,' approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety" on authority of the enacting clause of that Act set out as a Short Title note under section 1 of this title.
Codification
"Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.]" substituted in text for "Act entitled 'An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies,' approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety" on authority of the enacting clause of that Act set out as a Short Title note under section 1 of this title.