FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 65
Risk retention groups
15 U.S.C. § 3902
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter65 — LIABILITY RISK RETENTION
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 3902 (Risk retention groups) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 3902.
Text
(a)Exemptions from State laws, rules, regulations, or orders
Except as provided in this section, a risk retention group is exempt from any State law, rule, regulation, or order to the extent that such law, rule, regulation, or order would—
(1)make unlawful, or regulate, directly or indirectly, the operation of a risk retention group except that the jurisdiction in which it is chartered may regulate the formation and operation of such a group and any State may require such a group to—
(A)comply with the unfair claim settlement practices law of the State;
(B)pay, on a nondiscriminatory basis, applicable premium and other taxes which are levied on admitted insurers and surplus lines insurers, brokers, or policyholders under the laws of the State;
(C)participate, on a nondiscriminatory ba
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Home Warranty Corporation v. Johnnie L. Caldwell, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Georgia, Defendant
777 F.2d 1455 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. James P. Corcoran, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York
850 F.2d 88 (Second Circuit, 1988)
National Home Insurance v. State Corp. Commission
838 F. Supp. 1104 (E.D. Virginia, 1993)
Swanco Insurance Company--Arizona v. William D. Hager, Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Iowa
879 F.2d 353 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
Home Warranty Corp. v. Elliott
585 F. Supp. 443 (D. Delaware, 1984)
Charter Risk Retention Group Insurance v. Rolka
796 F. Supp. 154 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
Mears Transportation Group v. Florida
34 F.3d 1013 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Alabama Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Reliance Insurance Co. in Liquidation
100 A.3d 702 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk Retention Group v. Pataki
85 F.3d 913 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Onyx Insurance Co. v. New Jersey Department of Banking & Insurance Division
704 F. App'x 110 (Third Circuit, 2017)
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC v. Baker and Son Construction Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Adams v. AIS Trucking , LLC
(S.D. Georgia, 2025)
McIntire v. Ventura
(S.D. Georgia, 2021)
Opn. No.
(New York Attorney General Reports, 1990)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–45, §3, Sept. 25, 1981, 95 Stat. 950; Pub. L. 99–563, §§5, 7, 8(a), 12(c), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3172, 3175, 3178.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1986—Subsec. (a)(1)(C). Pub. L. 99–563, §12(c), struck out "product liability or completed operations" before "liability insurance losses".
Subsec. (a)(1)(D). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1), redesignated subpar. (E) as (D), substituted a semicolon for ", and, upon request, furnish such commissioner a copy of any financial report submitted by the risk retention group to the commissioners of the chartering or licensing jurisdiction;", and struck out former subpar. (D) which read as follows: "submit to the appropriate authority reports and other information required of licensed insurers under the laws of a State relating solely to product liability or completed operations liability insurance losses and expenses;".
Subsec. (a)(1)(E). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (c), redesignated subpar. (F) as (E), further redesignated cl. (ii) as (i), added cl. (ii), and struck out former cl. (i) which read as follows: "the commissioner has reason to believe the risk retention group is in a financially impaired condition; and". Former subpar. (E) redesignated (D).
Subsec. (a)(1)(F). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (d), redesignated subpar. (G) as (F) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (F) read as follows: "comply with a lawful order issued in a delinquency proceeding commenced by the State insurance commissioner if the commissioner of the jurisdiction in which the group is chartered has failed to initiate such a proceeding after notice of a finding of financial impairment under subparagraph (F) of this paragraph;". Former subpar. (F) redesignated (E).
Subsec. (a)(1)(G) to (I). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (e), added subpars. (G) to (I). Former subpar. (G) redesignated (F).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(a), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "The exemptions specified in subsection (a) of this section apply to—
"(1) product liability or completed operations liability insurance coverage provided by a risk retention group for—
"(A) such group; or
"(B) any person who is a member of such group;
"(2) the sale of product liability or completed operations liability insurance coverage for a risk retention group; and
"(3) the provision of insurance related services or management services for a risk retention group or any member of such group."
Subsecs. (d) to (h). Pub. L. 99–563, §§5(b)(2), 7, 8(a), added subsecs. (d) to (h).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Special Rule Regarding Feasibility Study
The provisions of subsec. (d) of this section, relating to the submission of a feasibility study, not applicable with respect to any line or classification of liability insurance which was defined in this chapter before Oct. 27, 1986, and was offered before such date by any risk retention group chartered and operating for not less than 3 years before such date, see section 11(b) of Pub. L. 99–563, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment; Applicability note under section 3901 of this title.
Amendments
1986—Subsec. (a)(1)(C). Pub. L. 99–563, §12(c), struck out "product liability or completed operations" before "liability insurance losses".
Subsec. (a)(1)(D). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1), redesignated subpar. (E) as (D), substituted a semicolon for ", and, upon request, furnish such commissioner a copy of any financial report submitted by the risk retention group to the commissioners of the chartering or licensing jurisdiction;", and struck out former subpar. (D) which read as follows: "submit to the appropriate authority reports and other information required of licensed insurers under the laws of a State relating solely to product liability or completed operations liability insurance losses and expenses;".
Subsec. (a)(1)(E). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (c), redesignated subpar. (F) as (E), further redesignated cl. (ii) as (i), added cl. (ii), and struck out former cl. (i) which read as follows: "the commissioner has reason to believe the risk retention group is in a financially impaired condition; and". Former subpar. (E) redesignated (D).
Subsec. (a)(1)(F). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (d), redesignated subpar. (G) as (F) and amended it generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (F) read as follows: "comply with a lawful order issued in a delinquency proceeding commenced by the State insurance commissioner if the commissioner of the jurisdiction in which the group is chartered has failed to initiate such a proceeding after notice of a finding of financial impairment under subparagraph (F) of this paragraph;". Former subpar. (F) redesignated (E).
Subsec. (a)(1)(G) to (I). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(b)(1)(A), (e), added subpars. (G) to (I). Former subpar. (G) redesignated (F).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–563, §5(a), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "The exemptions specified in subsection (a) of this section apply to—
"(1) product liability or completed operations liability insurance coverage provided by a risk retention group for—
"(A) such group; or
"(B) any person who is a member of such group;
"(2) the sale of product liability or completed operations liability insurance coverage for a risk retention group; and
"(3) the provision of insurance related services or management services for a risk retention group or any member of such group."
Subsecs. (d) to (h). Pub. L. 99–563, §§5(b)(2), 7, 8(a), added subsecs. (d) to (h).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Special Rule Regarding Feasibility Study
The provisions of subsec. (d) of this section, relating to the submission of a feasibility study, not applicable with respect to any line or classification of liability insurance which was defined in this chapter before Oct. 27, 1986, and was offered before such date by any risk retention group chartered and operating for not less than 3 years before such date, see section 11(b) of Pub. L. 99–563, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment; Applicability note under section 3901 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 3902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/3902.