FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Application of antitrust laws to professional major league baseball

15 U.S.C. § 26b
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 26b (Application of antitrust laws to professional major league baseball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 26b.

Text

(a)Major league baseball subject to antitrust laws Subject to subsections (b) through (d), the conduct, acts, practices, or agreements of persons in the business of organized professional major league baseball directly relating to or affecting employment of major league baseball players to play baseball at the major league level are subject to the antitrust laws to the same extent such conduct, acts, practices, or agreements would be subject to the antitrust laws if engaged in by persons in any other professional sports business affecting interstate commerce.
(b)Limitation of section No court shall rely on the enactment of this section as a basis for changing the application of the antitrust laws to any conduct, acts, practices, or agreements other than those set forth in subsection (a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC
870 F.3d 682 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
55 case citations
Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
120 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D. New York, 2014)
29 case citations
Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl
814 F.3d 1129 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
20 case citations
Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. Chicago Baseball Holdings, LLC
87 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
18 case citations
City of San Jose v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
776 F.3d 686 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
14 case citations
Sergio Miranda v. Allan Selig
860 F.3d 1237 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
8 case citations
Laumann v. National Hockey League
56 F. Supp. 3d 280 (S.D. New York, 2014)
5 case citations
Wyckoff v. Office of Commissioner of Baseball
211 F. Supp. 3d 615 (S.D. New York, 2016)
4 case citations
Wyckoff v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
705 F. App'x 26 (Second Circuit, 2017)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §27, as added Pub. L. 105–297, §3, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2824.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
Public Law 87–331, referred to in subsec. (b)(4), is Pub. L. 87–331, Sept. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 732, which is classified generally to chapter 32 (§1291 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Codification
Another section 27 of act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, was renumbered section 28 and is classified to section 27 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Purpose
Pub. L. 105–297, §2, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2824, provided that: "It is the purpose of this legislation to state that major league baseball players are covered under the antitrust laws (i.e., that major league baseball players will have the same rights under the antitrust laws as do other professional athletes, e.g., football and basketball players), along with a provision that makes it clear that the passage of this Act [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] does not change the application of the antitrust laws in any other context or with respect to any other person or entity."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 26b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/26b.