FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—LEAD EXPOSURE REDUCTION
Definitions
15 U.S.C. § 2681
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—LEAD EXPOSURE REDUCTION
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 2681 (Definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 2681.
Text
For the purposes of this subchapter: The term "abatement" means any set of measures designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards in accordance with standards established by the Administrator under this subchapter. Such term includes—
(A)the removal of lead-based paint and lead-contaminated dust, the permanent containment or encapsulation of lead-based paint, the replacement of lead-painted surfaces or fixtures, and the removal or covering of lead-contaminated soil; and
(B)all preparation, cleanup, disposal, and postabatement clearance testing activities associated with such measures.
The term "accessible surface" means an interior or exterior surface painted with lead-based paint that is accessible for a young child to mouth or chew.
The term "deteriorated paint" means any
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
A Community Voice v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
878 F.3d 779 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Inc. v. Vallone
794 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Environmental Protection Agency
682 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
National Multi Housing Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
292 F.3d 232 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Inc. v. Vallone
293 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Menerick v. Salem Heritage, LLC
(W.D. Virginia, 2023)
A Community Voice v. Usepa
997 F.3d 983 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
Center For Biological Diversity v. Debra Haaland
(C.D. California, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 94–469, title IV, §401, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1021(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3912; amended Pub. L. 115–31, div. K, title II, §237(c), May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 789.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2017—Par. (17). Pub. L. 115–31, §237(c)(1), which directed insertion of "or any 0-bedroom dwelling" after "disabilities,", was executed by making the insertion after "disabilities" the first place appearing to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Pub. L. 115–31, §237(c)(2), which directed substitution of "housing)" for "housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0 bedroom dwelling", was executed by making the substitution for "housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0-bedroom dwelling" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Amendments
2017—Par. (17). Pub. L. 115–31, §237(c)(1), which directed insertion of "or any 0-bedroom dwelling" after "disabilities,", was executed by making the insertion after "disabilities" the first place appearing to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Pub. L. 115–31, §237(c)(2), which directed substitution of "housing)" for "housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0 bedroom dwelling", was executed by making the substitution for "housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0-bedroom dwelling" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 2681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/2681.